Repository navigation
docs: initial draft of requirement process - #377
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html |
aschemmel-tech
left a comment
aschemmel-tech
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No OSS publishing issues found. Detailed content review pending.
masc2023
requested changes
Feb 14, 2025
masc2023
left a comment
masc2023
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Documentation in Sphinx based on metamodel shows some issues, attribute safety/security are shown, where not needed, e.g. process requirements, having tag structure?, Attribute text for workflows and work product are not ok
hoe-jo
commented
Feb 18, 2025
hoe-jo
commented
Feb 18, 2025
hoe-jo
commented
Feb 18, 2025
hoe-jo
commented
Feb 18, 2025
| :status: valid | ||
| :tags: attribute, mandatory | ||
|
|
||
| Each requirement shall have a type of one of following options: |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we have to support multi selection. E.g. A legal requirement can request a Non-Functional requirement. What shall be selected here?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In general you could select both attributes, there is no check for it that you can only name one
Requirements Process description including: - contept - getting startet - process requirements - checklists - templates fixed #308 Also-by: aschemmel-tech
hoe-jo
force-pushed
the
hoe_jo_initial_draft_requirement_guidance
branch
from
February 21, 2025 12:46
953ea2e to
3bd31cc
Compare
masc2023
reviewed
Feb 21, 2025
masc2023
reviewed
Feb 21, 2025
masc2023
requested changes
Feb 21, 2025
masc2023
left a comment
masc2023
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please correct the templates to the agreed form
corrected findings of 2nd review
masc2023
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2025
masc2023
left a comment
masc2023
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review findings resolved
masc2023
self-requested a review
February 21, 2025 14:50
masc2023
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Requirements Process description including:
fixed #308
Also-by: aschemmel-tech