Skip to content

A4-5-1: Ignore bitmask types #366

Closed
#518
Closed
A4-5-1: Ignore bitmask types#366
#518
Assignees
rvermeulen
Labels
Difficulty-LowA false positive or false negative report which is expected to take <1 day effort to addressImpact-Mediumfalse positive/false negativeAn issue related to observed false positives or false negatives.user-reportIssue reported by an end user of CodeQL Coding Standards

Description

@lcartey
lcartey
opened on Sep 29, 2023

Affected rules

  • A4-5-1

Description

We need to implement the "bitmask types" exception for this query:

It is allowed to use the enumeration as operand to all built-in and overloaded operators if the enumeration satisfies the “BitmaskType” concept [16].

Example

enum class byte : std::uint8_t{};

Activity

  1. lcartey
    added
    false positive/false negativeAn issue related to observed false positives or false negatives.
    user-reportIssue reported by an end user of CodeQL Coding Standards
    Difficulty-LowA false positive or false negative report which is expected to take <1 day effort to address
    Impact-Medium
    on Sep 29, 2023
  2. rvermeulen
    self-assigned this
    on Jan 10, 2024
  3. rvermeulen
    added this to Coding Standards Public Development Boardon Jan 23, 2024
  4. rvermeulen
    moved this to Scheduled in Coding Standards Public Development Boardon Jan 23, 2024
  5. rvermeulen
    moved this from Scheduled to In Progress in Coding Standards Public Development Boardon Jan 31, 2024
  6. rvermeulen
    moved this from In Progress to Ready for review in Coding Standards Public Development Boardon Jan 31, 2024
  7. knewbury01
    moved this from Ready for review to Reviewed in Coding Standards Public Development Boardon Feb 1, 2024
  8. github-merge-queue
    added a commit that references this issue on Feb 13, 2024

    Merge pull request #518 from rvermeulen/rvermeulen/fix-366

    6da55ef
  9. knewbury01
    closed this as completedin #518on Feb 13, 2024
  10. github-project-automation
    moved this from Reviewed to Done in Coding Standards Public Development Boardon Feb 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Difficulty-LowA false positive or false negative report which is expected to take <1 day effort to addressImpact-Mediumfalse positive/false negativeAn issue related to observed false positives or false negatives.user-reportIssue reported by an end user of CodeQL Coding Standards

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions