Skip to content

A3-9-1: Ignore use of int in operator increment/decrement #614

Closed

Description

@lcartey

Affected rules

  • A3-9-1

Description

Post-increment and post-decrement operators are required by the standard to have a dummy int parameter, and so should not be reasonably flagged by this rule.

Example

 constexpr reverse_iterator operator++(int);

Activity

  1. added
    Difficulty-LowA false positive or false negative report which is expected to take <1 day effort to address
    false positive/false negativeAn issue related to observed false positives or false negatives.
    user-reportIssue reported by an end user of CodeQL Coding Standards
    on Jun 6, 2024
  2. self-assigned this
    on Jun 24, 2024
  3. moved this from Triaged to Ready for review in Coding Standards Public Development Boardon Jun 24, 2024
  4. jokerputihboy commented on Jun 27, 2024

    @jokerputihboy
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Difficulty-LowA false positive or false negative report which is expected to take <1 day effort to addressImpact-LowPhase IIIStandard-AUTOSARfalse positive/false negativeAn issue related to observed false positives or false negatives.user-reportIssue reported by an end user of CodeQL Coding Standards

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions