Skip to content

Is clientjs an idled project? #155

Open

Description

@mohaa7

Is it abandoned?

As the code has not been touched for a year, is it recommended to use in production, in terms of bug reports followup?

Will it have any future major release?

Activity

  1. avpaderno commented on Apr 9, 2023

    @avpaderno

    If you are looking for a different library, there is the FingerprintJS library, which has an accuracy between 40% and 60%, but it is fully open source.
    ClientJS itself has been built upon Valve/fingerprintjs, which then evolved into fingerprintjs/fingerprintjs.

  2. jackspirou commented on Apr 9, 2023

    @jackspirou
    Owner

    ClientJS is not built on FingerprintJS, but you should def use FingerprintJS! It's professionally maintained, and does provide good accuracy for an open source, client side only product.

  3. avpaderno commented on Apr 10, 2023

    @avpaderno

    I apologize: I was "quoting" the project page, which says Built Upon: and shows three links, including  https://web.archive.org/web/20200714191004/https://github.com/Valve/fingerprintjs.

    I did not mean this library has code that comes from that library, but that the project page has links to other libraries, which I take it as meaning These are other libraries with a similar purpose. If I were to look to alternatives, I would check those three links.

  4. acastro2 commented on Aug 2, 2023

    @acastro2

    https://github.com/fingerprintjs/fingerprintjs just change its license so it can't run in production anymore

  5. avpaderno commented on Aug 2, 2023

    @avpaderno

    3.x and lower versions are still licensed under MIT.

  6. peter-wd-1 commented on Nov 1, 2023

    @peter-wd-1

    3.x and lower versions are still licensed under MIT.

    is this true? I can use it on production?

  7. mohaa7 commented on Nov 1, 2023

    @mohaa7
    Author

    I can use it on production?

    Changes are not retroactive. The code in version4 is still readble, but not open source anymore! By version3 you will be stuck on an immobile creature!

  8. avpaderno commented on Nov 1, 2023

    @avpaderno

    Yes, Branch 3.x is still licensed under MIT. I guess they will not back-port to branch 3.x the changes they introduce in branch 4.x, though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions