Repository navigation
Repair original ML and crime exercises with explicit data and verified demos - #2
Conversation
|
Exact-head implementation and provenance receipt for
Ready for the designated merger’s independent review. I did not merge. |
|
Independent review — CLEAR at exact head Evidence independently reproduced:
Scope is truthful: deterministic fictional fixture only. The displayed metrics are observations from seed 8257, not claims about real data, accuracy, scale, deployment, latency, or production performance. No blocking findings. |
|
Continuation review fixed the original exercises as well as the existing demo path. Exact head: The existing four-model GIF/MP4 inputs and receipt remain unchanged and their fail-closed/full-decode verifier passes. The GIF describes that four-model workflow; it does not depict the newly repaired ten-model or crime path. The absent original Boston/London files are not reproduced, and fixture coefficients are not evidence of real-world accuracy or causal effects. No merge performed. |
|
Final continuation follow-up rejects an empty crime panel before constructing an OLS design, and verifies invalid logarithm inputs. Frozen reviewed head is now |
|
Independent current-head review: Ready for the scoped offline workflows. Original Boston/London datasets are absent; CSV checks used synthetic fixtures. The existing GIF covers the separate four-model path. Fitted-model checkpoint/reload, deployment, causal identification, and real-world accuracy remain unproven. No owner-branch changes were made by this review. |
The original
ml1.pyreferenced undefined data,model_selection.pyrequired an implicit remote dataset, and the crime exercise depended on an absent author-local CSV while subtracting unmatched year rows. These entry points now accept explicit local CSVs or explicitly fictional offline fixtures, with the original source preserved byte-for-byte inarchive/.All ten original regression candidate families use training-only five-fold model selection and one disjoint holdout. Log-model predictions return to original target units. The crime exercise joins differences by borough/week, validates panel pairs and numerical inputs, rejects unidentified designs, and fits all three descriptive OLS specifications; the redundant
sixweeksmain effect is absorbed by the retained week fixed effects. The separate four-model demo workflow remains unchanged with verified GIF, MP4, poster and capture receipt.Validation: fresh Python 3.12 installation and dependency check; 21 tests; actual fixture and local-CSV model executions; three OLS regressions on 1,040 matched fictional pairs; unchanged source/media provenance and full GIF/MP4 decoding. Hosted Python 3.10/3.12 execution passed both complete jobs and uploaded model receipts.
Reviewed head:
9391f2e3dec6704f3c2b907345714b3cffb22634; tree:61540009979c11febbf25c59e9c2b7fdc9235f02. The existing media depicts the unchanged four-model workflow, rather than the newly added ten-model or crime runs. Original Boston/London files remain absent; fixture metrics do not reproduce those studies or establish real-world accuracy, causal effects or deployment performance.