Skip to content

REQUEST: Netlify - Add custom domain for dranet.netlify.app #6451

Open

Description

@gauravkghildiyal

Repository

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/dranet

Project domain

dranet.sigs.k8s.io

Additional context for request

We have the dranet.dev domain which we'd like to add as a custom domain within the netlify setup of dranet.netlify.app. The domain dranet.dev has already been configured to point to netlify 75.2.60.5 as per instruction from https://docs.netlify.com/manage/domains/configure-domains/configure-external-dns/

I think the instructions that can be used to achieve addition of this new domain dranet.dev are available at https://docs.netlify.com/manage/domains/manage-domains/assign-a-domain-to-your-site-app/. We'll need someone with k8s netlify access to make this addition.

Activity

  1. aojea commented on Jun 18, 2026

    @aojea
    Member

    /lgtm

  2. dims commented on Jun 18, 2026

    @dims
    Member

    @gauravkghildiyal it's self-service :) see kubernetes/k8s.io#9357

  3. dims commented on Jun 18, 2026

    @dims
    Member

    /transfer k8s.io

  4. gauravkghildiyal commented on Jun 18, 2026

    @gauravkghildiyal
    MemberAuthor

    Hey @dims, thanks for looking :)

    So actually this request is different.

    1. We already have dranet.sigs.k8s.io point to dranet.netlify.app. https://github.com/kubernetes/k8s.io/pull/9358/changes is equivalent to the PR you shared.
    2. Within netlify, I think we also need to configure an 'externally managed domain' dranet.dev to be accepted as an additional domain to dranet.netlify.app. For context, dranet.dev was previously setup as a Google managed domain, so while we're working on transferring that ownership to CNCF, we wanted to atleast have it functional with the correct server in the mean time.

    The request here is focused on point 2 above.

    Question: Does it make sense to keep this request in kubernetes/org where netlify related requests are made?

  5. dims commented on Jun 18, 2026

    @dims
    Member

    /transfer org

  6. aojea commented on Jun 28, 2026

    @aojea
    Member

    I think this is already done and we can close

    /close

  7. kubernetes-prow commented on Jun 28, 2026

    @kubernetes-prow
    Contributor

    @aojea: Closing this issue.

    Details

    In response to this:

    I think this is already done and we can close

    /close

    Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

  8. palnabarun commented on Jun 28, 2026

    @palnabarun
    Member

    I don't see dranet.dev as an alias for the project.

  9. gauravkghildiyal commented on Jun 29, 2026

    @gauravkghildiyal
    MemberAuthor

    @palnabarun Yes this is still pending. Can you help with this?

    (Don't have permission to reopen the issue)

  10. palnabarun commented on Jun 30, 2026

    @palnabarun
    Member

    I have the permissions to add the domain. I would want to check whether we typically allow a non-CNCF owned domain to be served from our Netlify.

    @natalisucks @divya-mohan0209 @reylejano -- as Netlify admin counterparts from SIG Docs, what's your view on this?

    /reopen
    (about the reopen perms, one can always reopen an issue with the slash command)

  11. kubernetes-prow commented on Jun 30, 2026

    @kubernetes-prow
    Contributor

    @palnabarun: Reopened this issue.

    Details

    In response to this:

    I have the permissions to add the domain. I would want to check whether we typically allow a non-CNCF owned domain to be served from our Netlify.

    @natalisucks @divya-mohan0209 @reylejano -- as Netlify admin counterparts from SIG Docs, what's your view on this?

    /reopen
    (about the reopen perms, one can always reopen an issue with the slash command)

    Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

  12. aojea commented on Jun 30, 2026

    @aojea
    Member

    Sorry about this, I totally missed the old domain, I thought we were orphaning it. Thanks Gaurav for following up

  13. natalisucks commented on Jun 30, 2026

    @natalisucks

    @palnabarun as per @gauravkghildiyal's comment above, it looks like they're working on transferring the domain to CNCF. if that's taking place, then waiting until the transfer happens to serve from Netlify means there's no exception to policy/rule.

    @gauravkghildiyal do you have a timeline on the transfer to CNCF?

  14. thisisnotapril commented on Jul 7, 2026

    @thisisnotapril

    I am working on getting this domain along with a couple others transferred to CNCF; hopefully it will just be a week or so - I will keep y'all posted!

  15. k8s-triage-robot commented on Oct 22, 2026

    @k8s-triage-robot

    The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

    This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

    • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
    • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
    • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

    You can:

    • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
    • Close this issue with /close
    • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

    Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

    /lifecycle stale

  16. added
    lifecycle/staleDenotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
    on Oct 22, 2026
  17. palnabarun commented on Oct 27, 2026

    @palnabarun
    Member

    /remove-lifecycle stale

    @thisisnotapril 👋🏽 did you end up transferring the domain to CNCF?

  18. removed
    lifecycle/staleDenotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
    on Oct 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions