Skip to content

Include SIG Leads as voting CNCF Maintainers #281

Closed

Description

@BenTheElder

Currently the steering committee are voting + service desk access members in https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/main/project-maintainers.csv

A few relevant SIGs have service desk access only (Contributor Experience, Infra, Release).

Following https://github.com/cncf/foundation/pull/223/files voting changed from fractional per project to one maintainer one vote.

The Steering Committee has discussed adding SIG Leads, that is Chairs and Tech Leads to the maintainers list in a non-service-desk but voting role.

We think this will reasonably improve the representation of the project, all other subgroups should have representation via Steerings and their SIG Leads.

For the service desk specifically, we already have sufficient representation across the SIGs that are responsible for providing services to the project and Steering.

This issue will track voting on these changes because relevant policy docs currently live across multiple repos in multiple locations.

/assign @kubernetes/steering-committee

Activity

  1. added
    committee/steeringDenotes an issue or PR intended to be handled by the steering committee.
    on Apr 17, 2024
  2. changed the title [-]Include SIG Leads as non-service-desk Voting CNCF Maintainers[/-] [+]Include SIG Leads as voting CNCF Maintainers[/+] on Apr 17, 2024
  3. dims commented on Apr 17, 2024

    @dims
    Member

    +1 thanks!

  4. parispittman commented on Apr 17, 2024

    @parispittman
    Contributor

    +1

  5. cpanato commented on Apr 18, 2024

    @cpanato
    Member

    +1

  6. MadhavJivrajani commented on Apr 19, 2024

    @MadhavJivrajani
    Contributor

    +1

  7. natalisucks commented on Apr 19, 2024

    @natalisucks

    +1

  8. soltysh commented on May 9, 2024

    @soltysh
    Contributor

    👍 (steering)

  9. justaugustus commented on May 9, 2024

    @justaugustus
    Member

    +1 (Steering)

  10. palnabarun commented on May 9, 2024

    @palnabarun
    Member

    +1 (steering)

  11. pacoxu commented on May 9, 2024

    @pacoxu
    Member

    +1 (Steering)

  12. self-assigned this
    on May 9, 2024
  13. cpanato commented on May 10, 2024

    @cpanato
    Member

    +1

  14. BenTheElder commented on May 14, 2024

    @BenTheElder
    MemberAuthor
  15. 30 remaining items

  16. BenTheElder commented on Jun 25, 2025

    @BenTheElder
    MemberAuthor

    @cblecker +1, I think that will require consensus from @kubernetes/steering-committee though.

  17. soltysh commented on Jun 25, 2025

    @soltysh
    Contributor

    I'm supportive - 👍

  18. aojea commented on Jun 25, 2025

    @aojea
    Member

    +1

  19. saschagrunert commented on Jun 26, 2025

    @saschagrunert
    Member

    +1

  20. pohly commented on Jun 26, 2025

    @pohly
    Contributor

    +1

  21. pacoxu commented on Jun 26, 2025

    @pacoxu
    Member

    +1

  22. justaugustus commented on Jun 26, 2025

    @justaugustus
    Member

    I'd like to request a special casing for the GB rep to also be on this list.

    +1 (Steering)

  23. BenTheElder commented on Aug 14, 2025

    @BenTheElder
    MemberAuthor

    An update:

    That last change with @cblecker is pending, and we otherwise just have "how often should we send updates and should it be a diff or can we send the full list" for future changes.

    This should be more or less complete since #281 (comment) and above but we of course will need to continue to submit updates, otherwise I would've closed this out.

  24. pacoxu commented on Aug 15, 2025

    @pacoxu
    Member

    "how often should we send updates and should it be a diff or can we send the full list" for future changes.

    Leads may update it themselves once there is a leader change. (We may add it to the lead change checklist of the template)
    Meanwhile, we may do it every quarter or half year in case the list is not synced. At least, we will update it once a year after steering election.

  25. BenTheElder commented on Aug 15, 2025

    @BenTheElder
    MemberAuthor

    Leads may update it themselves once there is a leader change. (We may add it to the lead change checklist of the template)

    I'm not sure that will work. It is not self-service yet, and the PR you see on github is only one of the steps.
    Currently we have to reach out to the CNCF's maintainers updates alias, I'm not sure if they would respond to requests from unknown parties.

    There was discussion of a self-service functionality at some point, but we don't have a firm ETA or any updates on that.

    Meanwhile, we may do it every quarter or half year in case the list is not synced. At least, we will update it once a year after steering election.

    Yes, I should've been clearer: I've reached out to the CNCF alias to ask about what would be acceptable frequency (I suggested perhaps roughly quarterly) and format wise wise (diff versus last update, or full current desired list).

  26. BenTheElder commented on Oct 22, 2025

    @BenTheElder
    MemberAuthor

    Tiny update: We still haven't heard back from our previous requests so I have bumped the thread again.

  27. riaankleinhans commented on Oct 22, 2025

    @riaankleinhans

    @BenTheElder, @cblecker added to cncf-kubernetes-maintainers mailing list.

  28. BenTheElder commented on Oct 22, 2025

    @BenTheElder
    MemberAuthor

    Thanks! per @jeefy (CNCF liason for kubernetes) we should send quarterly updates.

    kubernetes/community#8664 will make sure the GB rep is tracked alongside our other leads going forward.

    I'm going to close this out, steering will need to continue to send the ~quarterly updates to re-sync but that can just be regular business now.

    We understand in the future there will be a new mechanism for projects to manage this, and we can revisit then.

  29. moved this from In progress to Done in committee-steeringon Oct 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

committee/steeringDenotes an issue or PR intended to be handled by the steering committee.lifecycle/activeIndicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor.

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions