[lidge-jun]

Summary

#7359 added final EPERM quarantine > containment resolves TEMP with the 8.3-expanding native resolver by default, which fails on hosted Windows (dev ee3ad33, run 39215956943, windows 9/9, job 117939835484):

Expected: "C:\Users\RUNNER~1\AppData\Local\Temp\opencodex-test-egC04M\tmp\opencodex-test-Aa11Bb\tmp"
Received: "C:\Users\runneradmin\AppData\Local\Temp\opencodex-test-egC04M\tmp\opencodex-test-Aa11Bb\tmp"

The product behaved as intended: the default resolver expanded the 8.3 alias. The test's expectation, fixture.runTmp, comes from containedFixture(), which resolves with JS realpathSync and keeps the RUNNER~1 spelling. The expectation is now realpathSync.native(fixture.runTmp), computed before the spy is installed, so both sides go through the same native resolver. The spy assertion that pins realpathSync.native as the default is unchanged.

I checked the other #7359 case (an 8.3 TEMP alias still contains the long-form locked path) and the shared fixtures. That case runs both sides through its injected resolver and compares against JS-resolved fixture paths consistently, which is why it passed on the same Windows job. No other assertion mixes the two resolvers.

Verification

• bun test tests/ci-workflows/test-temp-quarantine.test.ts: 10/10 pass (macOS, where the two resolvers agree).
• The Windows behavior follows from the CI output above: the received value is exactly the native expansion of the expected path. Windows confirmation is left to the next lane=all run.

Checklist

• Scope stays focused and avoids unrelated cleanup.
• Docs or release notes were updated when needed. (Test-only.)
• Security-sensitive changes were reviewed for secrets, auth, and unsafe defaults.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Updated the temporary-path containment test to compare paths using the same native resolution behavior as the application, while retaining verification of the TEMP input.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-19T07:34:58.078376Z	e218317	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository: lidge-jun/opencodex/.coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: ASSERTIVE
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 84b75e7d-69af-4566-a169-0ce5879846c5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 955d8c2 and e218317.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1

• tests/ci-workflows/test-temp-quarantine.test.ts

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.

📝 Walkthrough

The TEMP containment test now derives its expected path with realpathSync.native. It retains the assertion that the resolver receives fixture.env.TEMP.

Changes: TEMP Path Test

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Native path assertion tests/ci-workflows/test-temp-quarantine.test.ts	The test compares the returned path with the native-resolved fixture path. It also verifies that the native resolver receives fixture.env.TEMP.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to e2183

This changes only the containment test’s expected path and does not alter production behavior. The reported macOS run passes; hosted-Windows confirmation remains pending, but no concrete merge-blocking risk is identified.

Pre-merge checks: 5

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check		Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check		The title clearly describes the main test change: comparing the default containment result through the native resolver. It is specific, concise, and aligned with the updated expectation in tests/ci-wo…
Docstring Coverage		No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Title check

Explanation

The title clearly describes the main test change: comparing the default containment result through the native resolver. It is specific, concise, and aligned with the updated expectation in tests/ci-workflows/test-temp-quarantine.test.ts.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

✅ Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.