[release/9.1] Rename ASPIRECOSMOS001 to ASPIRECOSMOSDB001 - #7691
Merged
Dan Moseley (danmoseley) merged 1 commit intoFeb 19, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Based on API review feedback
Eric Erhardt (eerhardt)
requested review from
Dan Moseley (danmoseley) and
Sébastien Ros (sebastienros)
February 19, 2025 22:10
Dan Moseley (danmoseley)
added
the
area-integrations
Dan Moseley (danmoseley)
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2025
Dan Moseley (danmoseley)
enabled auto-merge (squash)
February 19, 2025 22:20
Sébastien Ros (sebastienros)
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #7689 to release/9.1
/cc Dan Moseley (@danmoseley) Eric Erhardt (@eerhardt)
Customer Impact
Updating our diagnostic ID for CosmosDB preview emulator. This needs to be done before we ship 9.1, or else we won't be able to update it after.
Testing
Existing tests and playground code in the repo.
Risk
Almost none. Just a simple rename.
Regression?
NO