Repository navigation
validator: an slm under the Microtensor submission terms passes the licence check - #180
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…rena licence check
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The first testnet miner on ctx_compress was refused with
slm licence 'other' is not allowed in this arena. The miner template publishes the SLM under the Microtensor submission terms, which the Hub records aslicense: otherwithlicense_name: microtensor-submission. The arena'sallowed_licenses(apache-2.0, mit) lists the base model licences miners may build from, so applying it to the submitted model refused exactly what the template tells miners to do.An SLM card with
license: otherandlicense_name: microtensor-submissionnow passes. Cards under an allowed base licence still pass as before.Checked against the miner's card at d8d33ca.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code