fix(deps): raise vite to 8.1.5 to close three dev-server file-read advisories; 2.0.0-rc.3 - #1841
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…visories; 2.0.0-rc.3 The #1837 sweep moved vite to 8.0.16 in the root and tui manifests but left `clients/web` pinned at **8.0.0** — `npm update` reported "up to date" and only an explicit install would move it. That left five open advisories, three high: GHSA-fx2h-pf6j-xcff high `server.fs.deny` bypass via Windows ADS GHSA-v2wj-q39q-566r high `server.fs.deny` bypassed with queries GHSA-p9ff-h696-f583 high arbitrary file read via the dev server GHSA-v6wh-96g9-6wx3 medium launch-editor NTLMv2 hash disclosure GHSA-4w7w-66w2-5vf9 medium path traversal in optimized deps These are worth fixing rather than dismissing as "dev-only". Unlike the other remaining dev-scope alerts, `server.fs.deny` bypass is *remotely triggerable*: a malicious page can read arbitrary files from anyone running `npm run dev`. Published-package users are unaffected — they get the built `dist` and never run vite — but contributors are. Also raises the declared floor to `^8.1.5` in all three manifests that declare vite. The root previously declared `^8.0.0`, which still *permitted* the vulnerable 8.0.0 on a fresh resolve, so pinning the lockfile alone would have left a regression path open. Bumped to rc.3 rather than folding this into 2.0.0: vite builds the shipped bundle, so changing it changes the artifact, and the tree that ships should be the tree that was validated against the live registry. rc.2 validated a different tree. `npm run ci` passes — full chain including the coverage gate, build gate, smokes, and 462 Storybook tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Txmv2qqv3yeKgRzoqXytzD
Merged
cliffhall
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2026
The v2 go-live release (#1818, phase 5 of #1804). This is byte-identical to 2.0.0-rc.3 apart from dropping the prerelease suffix, which is what makes rc.3's validation meaningful: the tree that ships is the tree that was validated against the live registry. `2.0.0` has no hyphen, so the derivation added in #1834 resolves it to `latest` — this is the release that takes the tag from 1.0.1. Validated across three release candidates: - rc.1 caught two publish-path defects invisible to every local check — `NODE_AUTH_TOKEN` pointing at a non-existent secret (shadowing OIDC trusted publishing) and a missing npm CLI upgrade (trusted publishing needs >= 11.5.1; Node 22 bundles 10.x). Both fixed in #1836. - rc.2 validated the dependency sweep (#1837) that cleared every prod-scope advisory using lockfile-only changes. - rc.3 validated the vite 8.1.5 bump (#1841) closing three high-severity dev-server file-read advisories. Each RC was verified with a cold `node:22` container install driving the published tarball end to end — install, `--help`, and a real `--cli tools/list` against a live stdio server. `latest` remained on 1.0.1 throughout, proving the `--tag` derivation. Zero open Dependabot alerts at time of release. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Txmv2qqv3yeKgRzoqXytzD Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Jul 28, 2026
cliffhall
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2026
…8.1.5) (#1881) The 2.0.0-rc series shipped these dependency bumps to `main` only, so `v2/main` was developing against older versions and would have met them for the first time at the milestone merge. - `@hono/node-server` ^1.19.14 -> ^2.0.12 (root, clients/web) — a major. v2.0.0's only breaking changes are dropping Node 18 (the repo already requires >=22.19.0) and removing the `@hono/node-server/vercel` adapter (unused here). The used surface — `serve()`, `serveStatic`, `ServerType` — is unchanged, so no source edits were needed. - `vite` ^8.0.0 -> ^8.1.5 (root, clients/web) and ^8.0.16 -> ^8.1.5 (clients/tui) — the security bumps from #1841. `npm install` at the root (postinstall cascades into every client) regenerated the three touched lockfiles. `npm run ci` passes. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YAt8rqxysNbhYWLhoRm3fU Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
cliffhall
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2026
…SA-p63j-vcc4-9vmv (#1839) (#1899) GHSA-p63j-vcc4-9vmv (**critical**) — `@vitest/browser` Browser Mode provider commands accept a file path from the browser and act on it without checking the `allowWrite` permission gate. Patched in 4.1.10; `clients/web` was pinned at 4.1.0. Dev-scope only — `@vitest/*` is absent from the published `files` allowlist, and Browser Mode here runs this project's own Storybook play functions, never a third-party page. That is why #1837 deferred it rather than attempting a toolchain upgrade immediately before an irreversible publish. ## The knot, and what actually unties it `^4.1.0` already admits 4.1.10, so the declared ranges were never the problem. The family is welded by *exact* peer pins — `vitest` pins `@vitest/browser-playwright`, which pins `@vitest/browser` — so nothing moves alone. The issue predicted that an explicit coordinated `npm i -D` would fix it. It does not. With `clients/web/package-lock.json` in place, npm ERESOLVEs even when every member of the family plus the Storybook packages are named in one command and `node_modules` is deleted first: Found: @storybook/addon-a11y@10.2.19 Could not resolve dependency: dev @storybook/addon-a11y@"^10.5.5" Conflicting peer dependency: storybook@10.5.5 npm resolves against the existing lock tree and will not move the whole constellation at once. **Regenerating `clients/web/package-lock.json` is the only thing that unties it** — a clean resolve places all four at 4.1.10 with no peer complaints at all. ## Versions vitest 4.1.0 -> 4.1.10 @vitest/browser 4.1.0 -> 4.1.10 (transitive) @vitest/browser-playwright 4.1.0 -> 4.1.10 @vitest/coverage-v8 4.1.0 -> 4.1.10 storybook + @storybook/* 10.2.19 -> 10.5.5 eslint-plugin-storybook 10.2.19 -> 10.5.5 @chromatic-com/storybook 5.0.1 -> 5.2.1 `clients/{cli,tui,launcher}` were already resolving 4.1.9 (no browser pins, so they floated freely) and were never vulnerable. Their declared `^4.1.0` still *permitted* 4.1.0 on a fresh resolve, so the floor is raised to `^4.1.10` in all four manifests — same reasoning as the vite floor in #1841. Pinning only the lockfile would have left a regression path open. ## The vite 8 peer override Resolved, as a consequence rather than a workaround. `@joshwooding/vite-plugin-react-docgen-typescript@0.6.4` declared `peer vite@"^3 || ^4 || ^5 || ^6 || ^7"` against our vite 8. It is not a direct dependency — it arrives through `@storybook/react-vite`, which at 10.5.5 depends on `^0.7.0`, and 0.7.0 adds `^8.0.0` to that range. So taking Storybook 10.5.5 for the peer set drops the override too; nothing is forced. ## Two holds the regeneration forced, each with a tracked issue Regenerating the lock floats every other in-range dependency to current. Most of that is welcome — it is what takes `clients/web` from 19 advisories to 1 — but two floats broke the gate and are unrelated to this security fix: - **zod 4.3.6 -> 4.4.3** makes `clients/web`'s `tsc -b` die with `FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit` at the ~4GB default. Reverting zod alone makes it exit 0, so the attribution is unambiguous. Held at `~4.3.6`. See #1896. - **eslint-plugin-react-hooks 7.0.1 -> 7.1.1** enables `set-state-in-effect`, which fails `lint` on 8 pre-existing violations across 7 components. Fixing them is a real refactor with interaction-behavior consequences, not a suppression. Held at `~7.0.1`. See #1897. Both `~` pins are deliberate and temporary, and both issues say so — they are constraints to remove, not preferences. Storybook 10.5.5 also reports that `setProjectAnnotations` is applied automatically since 10.3, making `.storybook/vitest.setup.ts` redundant. Left in place: `./preview` carries the Mantine decorator and the a11y annotations drive the play-function assertions, and if automatic provisioning missed either, the 462 stories would render unthemed with a11y checks inert and very likely still pass. That silent-failure risk does not belong in a security bump. See #1898. ## Audit delta `clients/web`, where the advisory lived: before 19 (4 critical, 6 high, 6 moderate, 3 low) after 1 (1 low — esbuild-in-tsup, Windows dev server only) All four critical entries — `vitest`, `@vitest/browser`, `@vitest/browser-playwright`, `@vitest/coverage-v8` — are gone. The other 14 are transitive dev-tree advisories (hono, ws, js-yaml, flatted, brace-expansion, ...) cleared as a side effect of the clean resolve. Elsewhere: cli 6 -> 5, launcher 3 -> 2, tui 4 -> 4, root unchanged at 9 (its lock is untouched). Those remainders are pre-existing and unrelated. ## Verification `npm run ci` green end to end on the upgraded stack — the point of caring here, since this *is* the test infrastructure: - coverage gate (>=90 per file, all four dimensions) passes on all four clients; no file regressed, so no gate was lowered and no `v8 ignore` added - 4802 web tests, 304 cli, 282 tui, 5 launcher - 462 Storybook play functions across 109 files, on vitest 4.1.10 Browser Mode - verify:build-gate, and all five smokes including `smoke:tui` (real TTY here) Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YAt8rqxysNbhYWLhoRm3fU Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Aug 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #1818. Closes five vite advisories, three of them high, and bumps to
2.0.0-rc.3.What the sweep missed
#1837 moved vite to 8.0.16 in the root and tui manifests, but
clients/webstayed pinned at 8.0.0.npm update vitereported "up to date" and only an explicit install would move it — nothing in the peer graph actually pinned it, npm was just being conservative.server.fs.denybypass via Windows alternate data streamsserver.fs.denybypassed with querieslaunch-editorNTLMv2 hash disclosure via UNC pathWhy these are worth fixing rather than dismissing
The other remaining dev-scope alerts are being dismissed as tolerable — these are not, and the distinction matters.
server.fs.denybypass is remotely triggerable: a malicious page can read arbitrary files from anyone runningnpm run dev. Published-package users are unaffected (they get the builtdistand never run vite), but contributors to this repo are directly exposed. That is a materially different risk profile from a lint-time glob DoS.The declared floor, not just the pin
Also raises the declared range to
^8.1.5in all three manifests that declare vite. The root previously declared^8.0.0, which still permitted the vulnerable 8.0.0 on a fresh resolve — so updating the lockfile alone would have left the regression path open.^8.0.0^8.1.5^8.0.0(pinned 8.0.0)^8.1.5^8.0.16^8.1.5Why rc.3 rather than folding into 2.0.0
vite builds the shipped bundle, so changing it changes the artifact. rc.2 validated a different tree. The discipline held throughout this phase is that the tree which ships is the tree that was validated against the live registry — so this gets its own RC rather than riding along untested.
Verification
npm run ci— exit 0. Full chain:validate→coverage(per-file ≥90) → build-gate → smokes → Storybook (462 tests, 109 files).What remains after this
Only
@vitest/browser(3 critical — the exact-pin knot, #1839) andesbuild(3 low). Both dev-scope, both genuinely blocked, both to be dismissed astolerable_risk. The eslint cluster was auto-dismissed by GitHub itself; see #1838 for whynpm auditstill reports it.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01Txmv2qqv3yeKgRzoqXytzD