remove alpine from CITGM runs #1069

Activity

1. targos commented on Jul 22, 2024

   

   targos

   on Jul 22, 2024

   Member

   More actions

   Another option is to setup IPv6. Alpine runs in containers, maybe it's an easy change to the Dockerfile.

   ❤️React with ❤️1Reacted by Matteo Collina
2. targos commented on Jul 28, 2024

   

   targos

   on Jul 28, 2024

   Member

   More actions

   I had a look and I think we would need to configure ipv6 at the Docker daemon level: https://docs.docker.com/config/daemon/ipv6/#use-ipv6-for-the-default-bridge-network

   @nodejs/build-infra wdyt?

   It seems relatively important to me that we keep running CITGM on Alpine hosts because many people use it in production.
3. SimenB commented on Jul 28, 2024

   

   SimenB

   on Jul 28, 2024

   Last edited by SimenB

   Member

   More actions

   It seems relatively important to me that we keep running CITGM on Alpine hosts because many people use it in production.

   Agreed. Anecdotally, but I don't think I've encountered any node projects in production that does not use alpine (except for some that need specific native dependencies that are way easier with a debian distro). Might of course be extra skewed by debian being easier, thus leading to less bug reports etc.
4. sxa commented on Jul 25, 2026

   

   sxa

   on Jul 25, 2026

   Member

   More actions

   Particularly with the move to get Alpine/x64 to tier 2 I'd say it's increasingly important to keep this running. It's a bit of a shame if citgm (I appreciate it's likely individual modules rather than citgm itself!) cannot pass if IPv6 is absent though.
5. MikeMcC399 commented on Oct 9, 2026

   

   MikeMcC399

   on Oct 9, 2026

   Contributor

   More actions

   linux-x64-musl for Alpine Linux is now Tier 2, and ideally should be tested in citgm