Skip to content

Suggestion: Provide template/guides/automation for common maintainer needs #17

Closed

Description

@wesleytodd

There are many great tools and features we can take advantage of to help reduce day-to-day support workload. All of which take time and resources to research, setup, and maintain. That time takes away from actual support and maintenance of the modules themselves.

As an example, on Express we have talked about setting up GH issue templates, helpful bots and other things like this. But because the main contributors prioritize the immediate need of doing security patches, responding to user support requests, reviewing PRs, and discussion of new features those things don't get done. In a large community like Express, there are tons of repo's we would need to set this up for, making a small job for each into a big one for the whole group.

If there was a great template, guide, or even a team which could go around and do this for us, it would be super helpful. Is there is an automated way to add this? What about keeping them all updated as the standard changes? I think it would be great to hear from people who have set these up and decide on the best and most impactful things we can do.

These kind of resources would save each individual maintainer group from having to go through the whole process themselves. It would also mean that consumers and new contributors would be more likely to be familiar with the tools in use, so it might make it easier to get someone to take things over if you move on.

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Suggestion: Provide template/guides for common maintainer needs[/-] [+]Suggestion: Provide template/guides/automation for common maintainer needs[/+] on Nov 30, 2018
  2. self-assigned this
    on Jan 29, 2019
  3. bnb commented on Jan 29, 2019

    @bnb
    Member

    Assigned myself, per #137

  4. added
    toolsThis thing need to be implemented
    on Sep 13, 2019
  5. added
    stale?This issue is dusty, please take a look and consider closing
    on Jul 29, 2021
  6. jonchurch commented on Jul 29, 2021

    @jonchurch
    Contributor

    This is still something we definitely want to do. We have issues floating around that relate to this, but I think this issue is too large and ambiguous to be useful as it is.

    marking as stale? to get eyes on it before I close.

  7. thescientist13 commented on Jul 29, 2021

    @thescientist13
    SponsorContributor

    maybe this has / can been superseded by this issue now? #373

  8. jonchurch commented on Jul 29, 2021

    @jonchurch
    Contributor

    Agreed, ty for tying it to it's successor 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

stale?This issue is dusty, please take a look and consider closingtoolsThis thing need to be implemented

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions