* GenericActionPipelinePolicy - ConfigureAwait(false) for ProcessAsync method - #353
Merged
Merged
Conversation
vanek021
requested review from
ShivangiReja,
joseharriaga and
trrwilson
as code owners
February 19, 2025 04:35
joseharriaga
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2025
Collaborator
|
Thank you for your contribution, @vanek021 ! Great catch! |
This was referenced Sep 8, 2025
This was referenced Sep 15, 2025
This was referenced Sep 29, 2025
This was referenced Oct 13, 2025
This was referenced Oct 24, 2025
This was referenced Nov 24, 2025
This was referenced Dec 8, 2025
This was referenced Dec 22, 2025
This was referenced Dec 29, 2025
This was referenced Jan 5, 2026
This was referenced May 28, 2026
Closed
This was referenced Jun 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If this was not intentional, it might be better to add ConfigureAwait(false) to this method. In my case, there was dedlock with Blazor Server.
I think it would be better if the synchronization context was not captured inside the library