8391460: Implement JEP xxx: Structured Concurrency

[AlanBateman]

TBD

---

• I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the OpenJDK Interim AI Policy.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change requires CSR request JDK-8391461 to be approved

Issues

• JDK-8391460: Implement JEP xxx: Structured Concurrency (Enhancement - P4)
• JDK-8391461: Implement JEP xxx: Structured Concurrency (CSR)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/32602/head:pull/32602
$ git checkout pull/32602

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/32602
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/32602/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 32602

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 32602

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32602.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back alanb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• compiler
• core-libs
• security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[AlanBateman]

/label remove compiler
/label remove security

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman
The compiler label was successfully removed.

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman
The security label was successfully removed.

[ExE-Boss]

Will InheritableThreadLocal​::childValue(…) be enhanced to allow determining whether the new thread is being created as part of a StructuredTaskScope?

[AlanBateman]

Will InheritableThreadLocal​::childValue(…) be enhanced to allow determining whether the new thread is being created as part of a StructuredTaskScope?

Best to bring this to loom-dev mailing list as InheritableThreadLocal has been discussed a number of times already.