OCPBUGS-95473: bump containerd to v1.7.33 for CVE-2026-53488#16736
OCPBUGS-95473: bump containerd to v1.7.33 for CVE-2026-53488#16736Cragsmann wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Fixes host-root command execution via unvalidated image config labels in CRI plugin (CVSS 8.3). Upgrades github.com/containerd/containerd from v1.7.32 to v1.7.33.
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
@Cragsmann: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-95473, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 2 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Cragsmann The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Run `go mod tidy && go mod vendor` to fix vendor inconsistency detected by CI. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@Cragsmann: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Summary
github.com/containerd/containerdfrom v1.7.32 to v1.7.33Details
containerd CRI plugin propagates labels from image config (LABEL instruction in Dockerfile) to containers without validation. This can result in arbitrary command execution on the host via a crafted container image through the restart-monitor
binary://logger.Patched in containerd 1.7.33.
Test plan
go mod verifypassesFixes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-95473