Repository navigation
OSDOCS#4112[OPECO][4.14] Multi-arch support for Operator projects - #64355
Conversation
|
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/27183 |
21ad1cd to
69c712e
Compare
69c712e to
717cb3e
Compare
jaypoulz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK so I've left comments on the overall skeleton and provided extra context where I could.
Overall, this is already looking very good. I didn't have a chance to run through it with an example operator, but I will try to get to that early next week.
11fca67 to
ebbc283
Compare
|
@aleskandro and @jaypoulz I'm sorry for not responding to all of your feedback yet. I had some bugs come up that needed to be addressed. I have also needed to process some of the comments to adjust the information architecture of the content. I will reach out if I get blocked on anything. Thanks for your help! |
53531f9 to
3e15a33
Compare
jaypoulz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review is still in progress. I will pick up where I left off starting with the changes in osdk-multi-arch-node-affinity.adoc
28ae7e5 to
456179e
Compare
|
@jaypoulz and @everettraven I have reorganized the content based on both of your comments. In particular, I simplified the procedure for making a manifest list, removing the steps where I unintentionally repeated myself. I removed the skopeo related content, as well. Since the Operator SDK uses I also moved the validation procedure to the Bundle validate section of the docs. Lastly, I decided to link out to the procedure on adding labels to the Operator's CSV. That module needs to be rewritten to conform with this new content, and I am not going to be able to get to that before GA. |
|
/label qe-approved |
6cda9df to
78057f6
Compare
d0e842f to
3f60cdc
Compare
3f60cdc to
2853791
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
/label peer-review-needed |
|
/label peer-review-in-progress |
skopacz1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Left some comments, but looks good to me!
|
/remove-label peer-review-needed /label peer-review-done |
e179c5d to
1da00a6
Compare
skopacz1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A few more comments, let me know what you think!
1da00a6 to
1b3f924
Compare
1b3f924 to
12831f8
Compare
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
|
@michaelryanpeter: new pull request created: #65961 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Version(s): 4.14
Issue: OSDOCS-4112
Link to docs preview: Configuring Operator projects to support multiple architectures and operating systems
QE review:
Additional information: