Repository navigation
Description
Problem
With Antigravity ACP 1.3.0, the model catalog returned by the same authenticated Antigravity profile depends on the ACP clientInfo.name.
This is not a regression where updating ACP changed an existing 18-model T3 catalog down to 11 models. With the normal T3 identity, the raw ACP 1.3.0 runtime advertises 11 models. The 18-model catalog only appears when the client identifies itself as zed.
The additional models are the same Claude 5.5 and GPT-OSS variants also exposed by the Antigravity/agy CLI path.
Reproduction
Environment:
- macOS arm64
- Antigravity ACP 1.3.0
- OAuth personal authentication
- Same local Antigravity profile/account for all runs
- ACP protocol v2
- Same cwd
session/newwithmcpServers: []
Run A:
{
"method": "initialize",
"params": {
"protocolVersion": 2,
"clientInfo": {
"name": "t3-code",
"version": "0.0.46"
},
"clientCapabilities": {}
}
}Result after authentication + session/new:
- 11 model options
- Gemini models only
Run B changes only the client name:
{
"clientInfo": {
"name": "zed",
"version": "0.0.46"
}
}Result after authentication + session/new:
- 18 model options
- The same 11 Gemini models plus:
- Claude Opus 5.5 Low / Medium / High
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 Low / Medium / High
- GPT-OSS 120B Medium
Both runs use the same raw antigravity-acp 1.3.0 binary, same OAuth profile, same cwd, same protocol, and same session parameters. The only changed input is clientInfo.name.
Additional control runs with vscode, jetbrains, and a random ACP client name still returned 11 models. Both zed and Zed returned 18.
Controlled selection test
The difference is not cosmetic UI/catalog behavior.
With clientInfo.name = "t3-code", forcing:
claude-sonnet-5-5-low
through session/set_config_option is rejected by the raw ACP server with JSON-RPC error -32602:
Model 'claude-sonnet-5-5-low' is not available for the current authentication method.
The error response lists exactly the 11 Gemini models as available.
With the same OAuth profile and clientInfo.name = "zed", the same model switch succeeds. A real session/prompt using claude-sonnet-5-5-low completed with stopReason = end_turn and returned the expected test response.
So the extra 7 models are actually enabled by a Zed-specific path in ACP 1.3.0; they are not being injected only into T3's UI.
Expected behavior
T3 Code should have a supported way to receive the full Antigravity model catalog available through the provider/CLI integration without impersonating another ACP client implementation.
If Google intentionally gates Claude 5.5 / GPT-OSS availability by client identity, it would be useful to document the supported T3 client identifier / allowlist / capability-negotiation path, or coordinate a provider-side change.
Notes
- I am not proposing that T3 hard-code
clientInfo.name = "zed"; that would misidentify the client. - I am not proposing that T3 hard-code these models into
model-manifest.json. The catalog should remain dynamic and come from Antigravity. mcpServers: []is a separate compatibility detail. OmittingmcpServerscauses ACP 1.3.0 to rejectsession/newwith-32602 Field required; current T3 already supplies this field, and it is not what unlocks the extra models.- feat(server): bump Antigravity ACP agent to 1.3.0 #15746 correctly updates the managed runtime to ACP 1.3.0. This issue is about client-identity-dependent model availability in that runtime, not about the runtime version bump reducing the catalog.
Activity
t3dotgg commentedon Oct 21, 2026
Note
🤖 Claude Opus 5.5 responding on behalf of Theo
Thanks for the report. This fault is outside T3 Code, so we cannot fix it here. Please report it to the project that owns that tool. If you find a fault in T3 Code itself, please open a new issue with steps to reproduce it.
RomuloDrumond commentedon Oct 22, 2026
Agreed, it's a
clientInfo.nameallowlist in Google's ACP server. Reported upstream: google-antigravity/antigravity-cli#1318If you want Claude in T3 Code through Antigravity, 👍 that issue.