Loop detection could be done in message/term reference instead of pattern (?) #277

Activity

1. Pike

   added

   fluent-bundle

   on Aug 17, 2018
2. stasm commented on Aug 17, 2018

   

   stasm

   on Aug 17, 2018

   Contributor

   More actions

   I added it in Pattern to make this possible:

   open-foo = Open foo
       .accesskey = O
       .tooltip = Press {open-foo.accesskey} to open a Foo.
3. Pike commented on Aug 17, 2018

   

   Pike

   on Aug 17, 2018

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Right, it might be a bit trickier to get right. We'd need to keep open-foo, open-foo[var] and open-foo.bar distinct.
4. spookylukey commented on Aug 18, 2018

   

   spookylukey

   on Aug 18, 2018

   More actions

   @Pike - and also remember the fallback logic that happens when some attributes/variants are missing. I believe I added tests for those conditions, perhaps only in my compiler branch.
5. eemeli

   added 3 commits that reference this issue on Jan 2, 2026

   fix(bundle): Move loop detection to message & term resolution (#277)

   0dc6a82

   fix(bundle): Move loop detection to message & term resolution (#277)

   9051c6f

   fix(bundle): Move loop detection to message & term resolution (#277)

   eb0090e