Repository navigation
Conversation
Get rid of risk of `vStack` overflow. As a trade off: - the argument of `SAVE` must be a variable - multiple `GUARD_OBJ` cannot be placed at one line
Member
|
I'm planning to remove typedef struct {
VALUE obj; /* Back pointer(VALUE) for Ruby object. */
size_t MaxPrec;
size_t Prec;
SIGNED_VALUE exponent;
short sign;
short flag;
DECDIG frac[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_SIZE];
} Real;After #344, most GUARD_OBJ can be removed, and we only need few RB_GC_GUARD, I think. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Get rid of risk of
vStackoverflow.As a trade off:
SAVEmust be a variableGUARD_OBJcannot be placed at one line