Skip to content

rustdoc: Only analyze head of self type when deciding impl inlining - #159854

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 3 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
camelid:selfty-head
Jul 29, 2026
Merged

rustdoc: Only analyze head of self type when deciding impl inlining#159854
rust-bors[bot] merged 3 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
camelid:selfty-head

Conversation

@camelid

@camelid camelid commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

View all comments

We only care about whether the self type is a generic or an item (inlined) in
the current crate, so we don't actually need to compute the param_env, which is
expensive when done to every external impl. This PR avoids computing the
param_env until we actually decide to inline the impl. Moreover, it adds
specialized cleaning logic for types that stops after the "head" (the top-level
structure) is constructed, which is enough for the self type-based impl
inlining analysis.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 24, 2026
@camelid

camelid commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jul 24, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2026
rustdoc: Only analyze head of self type when deciding impl inlining
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: b8110ca (b8110ca9b8652ec8b2b3ae78916c0f05ed62d565)
Base parent: 29e68fe (29e68fe2295f8fc2feb52b8cb0b61a055842fdcf)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (b8110ca): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never rustc-perf
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-8.4% [-37.1%, -0.8%] 19
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-21.1% [-36.9%, -2.4%] 24
All ❌✅ (primary) -8.4% [-37.1%, -0.8%] 19

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -5.9%, secondary -8.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.1% [3.1%, 3.1%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
6.0% [6.0%, 6.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-6.4% [-11.8%, -1.2%] 20
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-9.3% [-12.7%, -2.9%] 23
All ❌✅ (primary) -5.9% [-11.8%, 3.1%] 21

Cycles

Results (primary -11.5%, secondary -23.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [2.5%, 2.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-11.5% [-38.4%, -2.6%] 17
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-24.7% [-38.6%, -2.7%] 23
All ❌✅ (primary) -11.5% [-38.4%, -2.6%] 17

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 488.104s -> 487.819s (-0.06%)
Artifact size: 387.69 MiB -> 387.70 MiB (0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jul 24, 2026
Comment thread src/librustdoc/passes/collect_trait_impls.rs Outdated
We only care about whether the self type is a generic or an item
(inlined) in the current crate, so we don't actually need to compute the
param_env, which is expensive when done to every external impl.
@camelid
camelid marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2026 20:10
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 24, 2026
@rustbot

rustbot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

r? @notriddle

rustbot has assigned @notriddle.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: rustdoc
  • rustdoc expanded to 8 candidates
  • Random selection from GuillaumeGomez, lolbinarycat, notriddle

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Jul 24, 2026
Comment thread src/librustdoc/passes/collect_trait_impls.rs Outdated
@camelid
camelid force-pushed the selfty-head branch 3 times, most recently from 69b025c to a1136eb Compare July 25, 2026 18:04
Comment thread src/librustdoc/passes/collect_trait_impls.rs
Comment thread src/librustdoc/passes/collect_trait_impls.rs Outdated
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 26, 2026
@camelid camelid added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 27, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added the T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output. label Jul 27, 2026
@Kobzol

Kobzol commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ugh, we really should enable compiler-docs in CI to avoid these annoying last-minute failures. Maybe we can enable mergeable CCI for internal docs since that should provide a big speedup to rustdoc?

With -Zrustdoc-mergeable-info, building compiler-docs goes from ~1m7s to ~20-25s on my desktop (on this branch, with all the rustdoc perf fixes I've done).

If it doesn't have any trade-offs that we would care about, please do send a PR! Building docs is indeed a non-trivial bottleneck for our CI.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2026
This feature is unstable but will be stabilized soon, and this is a good
way of dogfooding it to make sure it works properly. It should have no
effect on the generated docs, but it provides a significant speedup. For
example, I measure a 3x speedup locally (3m 11s -> 1m 1s) -- note that
this is with the latest rustdoc perf improvements (#159854).
@rust-log-analyzer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The job dist-x86_64-solaris failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 28, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💔 Test for e59475a failed: CI. Failed job:

@camelid

camelid commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Argh. Appears spurious AFAICT. I don't even see an error in the logs, weirdly...

@bors retry spurious>

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 28, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Just to be sure
@bors try jobs=dist-x86_64-solaris

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2026
rustdoc: Only analyze head of self type when deciding impl inlining


try-job: dist-x86_64-solaris
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 217458e (217458eabef1c6d9349658606aaa4460fcb75fb7)
Base parent: e19d321 (e19d321c06479c6fd77533582b0d5a86651f1be3)

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 29, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - CI
Approved by: notriddle,GuillaumeGomez
Duration: 3h 42m 18s
Pushing 701a651 to main...

@rust-bors
rust-bors Bot merged commit 701a651 into rust-lang:main Jul 29, 2026
15 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.99.0 milestone Jul 29, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 26ae60a (parent) -> 701a651 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 6 test diffs

Stage 1

  • [rustdoc-html] tests/rustdoc-html/inline_cross/impl-for-projection-reexport.rs: [missing] -> pass (J0)

Stage 2

  • [rustdoc-html] tests/rustdoc-html/inline_cross/impl-for-projection-reexport.rs: [missing] -> pass (J1)

Additionally, 4 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Job group index

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 701a6513a48eac30d49110ba06187648b7553622 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. x86_64-gnu-gcc-core-tests: 14m 41s -> 8m 45s (-40.3%)
  2. x86_64-gnu-llvm-21-1: 54m 59s -> 34m 57s (-36.4%)
  3. dist-powerpc64le-linux-musl: 1h 12m -> 1h 36m (+33.7%)
  4. x86_64-msvc-ext2: 2h 2m -> 1h 23m (-31.6%)
  5. i686-msvc-1: 2h 13m -> 2h 54m (+30.0%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-21-3: 1h 46m -> 1h 17m (-27.6%)
  7. x86_64-gnu-miri: 1h 39m -> 1h 14m (-25.1%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-gcc: 1h 14m -> 56m 24s (-24.8%)
  9. x86_64-msvc-1: 1h 59m -> 2h 27m (+23.3%)
  10. x86_64-msvc-ext1: 2h 7m -> 1h 38m (-23.3%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (701a651): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-9.1% [-39.9%, -0.9%] 19
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-22.8% [-39.7%, -2.6%] 24
All ❌✅ (primary) -9.1% [-39.9%, -0.9%] 19

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -6.5%, secondary -10.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.8% [2.8%, 2.8%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-7.0% [-13.7%, -1.5%] 20
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-10.6% [-13.2%, -3.0%] 23
All ❌✅ (primary) -6.5% [-13.7%, 2.8%] 21

Cycles

Results (primary -12.1%, secondary -25.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.0% [2.8%, 3.3%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-12.1% [-41.4%, -3.0%] 19
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-27.8% [-41.8%, -4.4%] 23
All ❌✅ (primary) -12.1% [-41.4%, -3.0%] 19

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 489.651s -> 491.747s (0.43%)
Artifact size: 390.13 MiB -> 390.11 MiB (-0.00%)

@camelid
camelid deleted the selfty-head branch July 29, 2026 15:36
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
…obzol,jieyouxu

bootstrap: Enable rustdoc mergeable CCI for std and internal docs



Takes a different approach to #160098, where the internal docs are merged by bootstrap directly invoking rustdoc. This requires bootstrap to gather the list of metadata directories by inspecting cargo's fingerprint files (which aren't stable). The first commit is written by @camelid, but I wrote the other two.

This feature is needed because:

1. The search index (that powers [web-based search](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/?search=ty%20-%3E%20rustdoc%3A%3Atype)) needs to contain all of the crates in the nightly-rustc project. In particular, I'd prefer if it contained Clippy, Rustdoc, and Rustc, since those crates share type checker stuff and the ability to search all three at once is convenient.
2. For every crate that rustdoc *currently* documents, it has to load the search index from the doc output dir, and rebuild the search index with the new crate added to it. Loading the search index requires $O(\text{crates})$ work, so doing it once for every crate means we're doing $O(\text{crates}^2)$ work overall.
3. It would be more efficient, *instead*, if each crate wrote its data separately, and then the final search index was generated at the end by merging them all at once. Obviously, this would make the work linear instead of quadratic. For the record, Hoogle and Sherlodoc have a similar index-generating step.
4. We call this "Mergeable Cross-Crate-Information." Cargo stores it in the build directory, and supplies it to Rustdoc in a separate phase that runs after everything else. When we eventually stabilize this feature, it will be invisible to (most) end users. `cargo doc` will just be faster.
5. So, in order for crates to share their cross-crate info, we need them to share a build directory.
6. Tools, like Rustdoc and Cargo, don't normally share a build directory with Rustc.
7. To make them share a build directory while generating documentation, without forcing them to share a build directory while compiling, I added a new mode.

---

This rustdoc feature is unstable but will be stabilized soon, and this is a good way of dogfooding it to make sure it works properly. It should have no effect on the generated docs, but it provides a significant speedup. For example, I measure a 3x speedup locally (3m 11s -> 1m 1s) for `x doc src/tools` -- note that this is with the latest rustdoc perf improvements (#159854).

r? @Kobzol
pull Bot pushed a commit to LeeeeeeM/miri that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2026
…obzol,jieyouxu

bootstrap: Enable rustdoc mergeable CCI for std and internal docs



Takes a different approach to rust-lang/rust#160098, where the internal docs are merged by bootstrap directly invoking rustdoc. This requires bootstrap to gather the list of metadata directories by inspecting cargo's fingerprint files (which aren't stable). The first commit is written by @camelid, but I wrote the other two.

This feature is needed because:

1. The search index (that powers [web-based search](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/?search=ty%20-%3E%20rustdoc%3A%3Atype)) needs to contain all of the crates in the nightly-rustc project. In particular, I'd prefer if it contained Clippy, Rustdoc, and Rustc, since those crates share type checker stuff and the ability to search all three at once is convenient.
2. For every crate that rustdoc *currently* documents, it has to load the search index from the doc output dir, and rebuild the search index with the new crate added to it. Loading the search index requires $O(\text{crates})$ work, so doing it once for every crate means we're doing $O(\text{crates}^2)$ work overall.
3. It would be more efficient, *instead*, if each crate wrote its data separately, and then the final search index was generated at the end by merging them all at once. Obviously, this would make the work linear instead of quadratic. For the record, Hoogle and Sherlodoc have a similar index-generating step.
4. We call this "Mergeable Cross-Crate-Information." Cargo stores it in the build directory, and supplies it to Rustdoc in a separate phase that runs after everything else. When we eventually stabilize this feature, it will be invisible to (most) end users. `cargo doc` will just be faster.
5. So, in order for crates to share their cross-crate info, we need them to share a build directory.
6. Tools, like Rustdoc and Cargo, don't normally share a build directory with Rustc.
7. To make them share a build directory while generating documentation, without forcing them to share a build directory while compiling, I added a new mode.

---

This rustdoc feature is unstable but will be stabilized soon, and this is a good way of dogfooding it to make sure it works properly. It should have no effect on the generated docs, but it provides a significant speedup. For example, I measure a 3x speedup locally (3m 11s -> 1m 1s) for `x doc src/tools` -- note that this is with the latest rustdoc perf improvements (rust-lang/rust#159854).

r? @Kobzol
github-actions Bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2026
…obzol,jieyouxu

bootstrap: Enable rustdoc mergeable CCI for std and internal docs



Takes a different approach to rust-lang/rust#160098, where the internal docs are merged by bootstrap directly invoking rustdoc. This requires bootstrap to gather the list of metadata directories by inspecting cargo's fingerprint files (which aren't stable). The first commit is written by @camelid, but I wrote the other two.

This feature is needed because:

1. The search index (that powers [web-based search](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/?search=ty%20-%3E%20rustdoc%3A%3Atype)) needs to contain all of the crates in the nightly-rustc project. In particular, I'd prefer if it contained Clippy, Rustdoc, and Rustc, since those crates share type checker stuff and the ability to search all three at once is convenient.
2. For every crate that rustdoc *currently* documents, it has to load the search index from the doc output dir, and rebuild the search index with the new crate added to it. Loading the search index requires $O(\text{crates})$ work, so doing it once for every crate means we're doing $O(\text{crates}^2)$ work overall.
3. It would be more efficient, *instead*, if each crate wrote its data separately, and then the final search index was generated at the end by merging them all at once. Obviously, this would make the work linear instead of quadratic. For the record, Hoogle and Sherlodoc have a similar index-generating step.
4. We call this "Mergeable Cross-Crate-Information." Cargo stores it in the build directory, and supplies it to Rustdoc in a separate phase that runs after everything else. When we eventually stabilize this feature, it will be invisible to (most) end users. `cargo doc` will just be faster.
5. So, in order for crates to share their cross-crate info, we need them to share a build directory.
6. Tools, like Rustdoc and Cargo, don't normally share a build directory with Rustc.
7. To make them share a build directory while generating documentation, without forcing them to share a build directory while compiling, I added a new mode.

---

This rustdoc feature is unstable but will be stabilized soon, and this is a good way of dogfooding it to make sure it works properly. It should have no effect on the generated docs, but it provides a significant speedup. For example, I measure a 3x speedup locally (3m 11s -> 1m 1s) for `x doc src/tools` -- note that this is with the latest rustdoc perf improvements (rust-lang/rust#159854).

r? @Kobzol
renovate-bot pushed a commit to renovate-bot/rust-lang-_-compiler-builtins that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2026
…obzol,jieyouxu

bootstrap: Enable rustdoc mergeable CCI for std and internal docs



Takes a different approach to rust-lang/rust#160098, where the internal docs are merged by bootstrap directly invoking rustdoc. This requires bootstrap to gather the list of metadata directories by inspecting cargo's fingerprint files (which aren't stable). The first commit is written by @camelid, but I wrote the other two.

This feature is needed because:

1. The search index (that powers [web-based search](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/?search=ty%20-%3E%20rustdoc%3A%3Atype)) needs to contain all of the crates in the nightly-rustc project. In particular, I'd prefer if it contained Clippy, Rustdoc, and Rustc, since those crates share type checker stuff and the ability to search all three at once is convenient.
2. For every crate that rustdoc *currently* documents, it has to load the search index from the doc output dir, and rebuild the search index with the new crate added to it. Loading the search index requires $O(\text{crates})$ work, so doing it once for every crate means we're doing $O(\text{crates}^2)$ work overall.
3. It would be more efficient, *instead*, if each crate wrote its data separately, and then the final search index was generated at the end by merging them all at once. Obviously, this would make the work linear instead of quadratic. For the record, Hoogle and Sherlodoc have a similar index-generating step.
4. We call this "Mergeable Cross-Crate-Information." Cargo stores it in the build directory, and supplies it to Rustdoc in a separate phase that runs after everything else. When we eventually stabilize this feature, it will be invisible to (most) end users. `cargo doc` will just be faster.
5. So, in order for crates to share their cross-crate info, we need them to share a build directory.
6. Tools, like Rustdoc and Cargo, don't normally share a build directory with Rustc.
7. To make them share a build directory while generating documentation, without forcing them to share a build directory while compiling, I added a new mode.

---

This rustdoc feature is unstable but will be stabilized soon, and this is a good way of dogfooding it to make sure it works properly. It should have no effect on the generated docs, but it provides a significant speedup. For example, I measure a 3x speedup locally (3m 11s -> 1m 1s) for `x doc src/tools` -- note that this is with the latest rustdoc perf improvements (rust-lang/rust#159854).

r? @Kobzol
asukaminato0721 pushed a commit to asukaminato0721/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2026
…obzol,jieyouxu

bootstrap: Enable rustdoc mergeable CCI for std and internal docs



Takes a different approach to rust-lang/rust#160098, where the internal docs are merged by bootstrap directly invoking rustdoc. This requires bootstrap to gather the list of metadata directories by inspecting cargo's fingerprint files (which aren't stable). The first commit is written by @camelid, but I wrote the other two.

This feature is needed because:

1. The search index (that powers [web-based search](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/?search=ty%20-%3E%20rustdoc%3A%3Atype)) needs to contain all of the crates in the nightly-rustc project. In particular, I'd prefer if it contained Clippy, Rustdoc, and Rustc, since those crates share type checker stuff and the ability to search all three at once is convenient.
2. For every crate that rustdoc *currently* documents, it has to load the search index from the doc output dir, and rebuild the search index with the new crate added to it. Loading the search index requires $O(\text{crates})$ work, so doing it once for every crate means we're doing $O(\text{crates}^2)$ work overall.
3. It would be more efficient, *instead*, if each crate wrote its data separately, and then the final search index was generated at the end by merging them all at once. Obviously, this would make the work linear instead of quadratic. For the record, Hoogle and Sherlodoc have a similar index-generating step.
4. We call this "Mergeable Cross-Crate-Information." Cargo stores it in the build directory, and supplies it to Rustdoc in a separate phase that runs after everything else. When we eventually stabilize this feature, it will be invisible to (most) end users. `cargo doc` will just be faster.
5. So, in order for crates to share their cross-crate info, we need them to share a build directory.
6. Tools, like Rustdoc and Cargo, don't normally share a build directory with Rustc.
7. To make them share a build directory while generating documentation, without forcing them to share a build directory while compiling, I added a new mode.

---

This rustdoc feature is unstable but will be stabilized soon, and this is a good way of dogfooding it to make sure it works properly. It should have no effect on the generated docs, but it provides a significant speedup. For example, I measure a 3x speedup locally (3m 11s -> 1m 1s) for `x doc src/tools` -- note that this is with the latest rustdoc perf improvements (rust-lang/rust#159854).

r? @Kobzol
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants