Fix typo in docs for MutableCloneableVector - #7620
Closed
lilyball wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
Landing as part of #7657. |
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2021
Re-write shadow lints changelog: Move shadow_unrelated to restriction changelog: The shadow lints find a lot more shadows and are not limited to certain patterns Drastically simplifies the implementation. Catches a lot more cases. I removed the "initialization happens here" note. It is not helpful IMO. Closes rust-lang#318 Fixes rust-lang#2890 Fixes rust-lang#6563 Fixes rust-lang#7588 Fixes rust-lang#7620
U007D
pushed a commit
to U007D/rust-mos
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2026
7620: Support control flow in `extract_function` assist r=matklad a=cpud36
Support `return`ing from outer function, `break`ing and `continue`ing outer loops when extracting function.
# Example
Transforms
```rust
fn foo() -> i32 {
let items = [1,2,3];
let mut sum = 0;
for &item in items {
<|>if item == 42 {
break;
}<|>
sum += item;
}
sum
}
```
Into
```rust
fn foo() -> i32 {
let items = [1,2,3];
let mut sum = 0;
for &item in items {
if fun_name(item) {
break;
}
sum += item;
}
sum
}
fn fun_name(item: i32) -> bool {
if item == 42 {
return true;
}
false
}
```
# Features
Supported variants
- break and function does not return => uses `bool` and plain if
- break and function does return => uses `Option<T>` and matches on it
- break with value and function does not return => uses `Option<T>` and if let
- break with value and function does return => uses `Result<T, U>` and matches on t
- same for `return` and `continue`(but we can't continue with value)
Assist does handle nested loops and nested items(like functions, modules, impls)
Try `expr?` operator is allowed together with `return Err(_)` and `return None`.
`return expr` is not allowed.
# Not supported
## Mixing `return` with `break` or `continue`
If we have e.g. a `return` and a `break` in the selected code, it is unclear what the produced code should look like.
We can try `Result<T, Option<U>>` or something like that, but it isn't idiomatic, nor it is established. Otherwise, implementation
is relatively simple.
## `break` with label
Not sure how to handle different labels for multiple `break`s.
[edit] implemented try `expr?`
Co-authored-by: Vladyslav Katasonov <cpud47@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.