Skip to content

(PFS) Rename payment provider rangeproof -> stf - #111

Merged
jagerman merged 1 commit into
session-foundation:pfsfrom
jagerman:rename-rp-to-stf-pfs
Aug 1, 2026
Merged

(PFS) Rename payment provider rangeproof -> stf#111
jagerman merged 1 commit into
session-foundation:pfsfrom
jagerman:rename-rp-to-stf-pfs

Conversation

@jagerman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The backend renamed the out-of-band grant provider from "rangeproof" to "stf", reflecting that such issuances come from the Session Technology Foundation, not the inactive Rangeproof dev house. Follow the wire/slug value ("stf") and the C/C++ constant names to match.

The backend renamed the out-of-band grant provider from "rangeproof" to
"stf", reflecting that such issuances come from the Session Technology
Foundation, not the inactive Rangeproof dev house. Follow the wire/slug
value ("stf") and the C/C++ constant names to match.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@jagerman
jagerman force-pushed the rename-rp-to-stf-pfs branch from 3efcc6a to dfc7295 Compare August 1, 2026 00:11
@jagerman
jagerman merged commit 6490571 into session-foundation:pfs Aug 1, 2026
1 check was pending
jagerman added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2026
Records dev up to 4a47113 as merged, keeping pfs's tree unchanged (-s ours).
Everything in the range is already applied to pfs:

- #104 (refund-requested-config) via #106 refund-requested-config-pfs
- #107 (drop-redeemed-at)        via #108 drop-redeemed-at-pfs
- #110 (rename-rp-to-stf)        via #111 rename-rp-to-stf-pfs
- #109 (fix-blinded-id-validation) forward-ported in the preceding commit

The first three were rewritten for pfs and so have different patch-ids, which
is why `git cherry` still reports their commits as absent; the content was
verified present by comparing the identifiers each PR added or removed across
both branches.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant