You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes, for RFC communication happens via this github issues channel
Depends on what above I call "level of contribution"
core: you can help, but we are fully responsible
project: depending on how important it is we might maintain it, according to how useful it is. (e.g. PointNet is ubiquitous, so the fact that its training pipeline is well oiled is important, other contributions might be less fundamental)
submodules: currently there are zero requirements, but I expect a dry-run coverage test will be asked at last, and if that test fails for too long – author's repo not maintained – we can drop the dependency. We have not setup this yet though.
We are using Google standard python format. I have not setup yapf-like automated systems yet, but would be great to add that in (will likely happen soon'ish)
@sofienbouaziz julien removed TravisCI, but the Build workflow does not check for coverage. You might want to add it back, and add the corresponding docs to this page?
Hi, @ataiya!
You might want to add the section about notebooks too. TensorFlow Docs team has notebook formatter. Just a link to existing Docs guidelines and a mention that failing formatting check will prevent PR from merging (just like linting and tests) would probably be enough.
I can format existing notebooks and add formatter test to the workflow (in fact I've already done half of it here so if you are interested, let me know!)
Activity
jackd commentedon May 9, 2020
Not specifically related to GSoC, but as someone who's keen to contribute whenever I find time:
taiya commentedon May 9, 2020
julienvalentin commentedon May 14, 2020
this looks good to me Andrea
taiya commentedon May 23, 2020
@julienvalentin, PTAL
taiya commentedon May 23, 2020
@sofienbouaziz julien removed TravisCI, but the Build workflow does not check for coverage. You might want to add it back, and add the corresponding docs to this page?
Molkree commentedon Jun 5, 2020
Hi, @ataiya!
You might want to add the section about notebooks too. TensorFlow Docs team has notebook formatter. Just a link to existing Docs guidelines and a mention that failing formatting check will prevent PR from merging (just like linting and tests) would probably be enough.
I can format existing notebooks and add formatter test to the workflow (in fact I've already done half of it here so if you are interested, let me know!)
taiya commentedon Jun 5, 2020
That's an interesting idea, but I let @julienvalentin comment here.
I do not use notebooks, nor will I ever :)