Fix 'Using a spread operator here creates a new object unnecessarily.' issue in src\sdk\graph\run.ts #628

Activity

1. coderabbitai commented on Jul 21, 2026

   

   coderabbitaiBot

   on Jul 21, 2026 – with coderabbitai

   More actions

   🔗 Related PRs

   #36 - [codex] Improve agent UX from manual pm audit [closed]
   #414 - Clear CLI complexity suppressions across PM SDK and CLI [merged]
   #418 - Refactor residual CodeFactor complexity hotspots [merged]
   #425 - Strengthen SDK linked-test imports and mandatory quality gates [merged]
   #581 - feat(sdk): graph governance completeness, dry-run remediation plans, incremental graph cache, MCP nested-option warnings [merged]

   ---

   📝 Issue Planner

   _{Check the box below or use the @coderabbitai plan command to generate an implementation plan and prompts that you can use with your favorite coding assistant.}

   • Create Plan

   ---

   🧪 Issue enrichment is currently in open beta.

   You can configure auto-planning by selecting labels in the issue_enrichment configuration.

   To disable automatic issue enrichment, add the following to your .coderabbit.yaml:

   issue_enrichment:
     auto_enrich:
       enabled: false

   💬 Have feedback or questions? Drop into our discord!
2. unbraind commented on Jul 21, 2026

   

   unbraind

   on Jul 21, 2026

   Owner

   More actions

   Tracked by pm-aw59hb, which groups GH-628, GH-629, and GH-630 under the existing code-quality lineage with focused and repo-wide verification requirements.
3. unbraind

   closed this as completedin #636on Jul 21, 2026
4. unbraind

   reopened this on Jul 27, 2026
5. unbraind

   added a commit that references this issue on Jul 28, 2026

   pm tracker: history-op governance, contract enumeration closure, rele…

   ...

   2ed01cd
6. unbraind commented on Jul 31, 2026

   

   unbraind

   on Jul 31, 2026

   Last edited by unbraind

   Owner

   More actions

   Tracked in pm-aw59hb.
7. unbraind commented on Aug 11, 2026

   

   unbraind

   on Aug 11, 2026

   Owner

   More actions

   pm tracker item: pm-92if

   This CodeFactor rule finding is tracked under the code-quality remediation programme rather than as an individual item. Single-rule style and micro-performance findings are driven to zero per category by the programme's children rather than closed one report at a time.
8. unbraind

   added a commit that references this issue on Aug 11, 2026

   docs(pm): record GitHub issue ownership for the CodeFactor findings

   ...

   ddb64a6
9. unbraind commented on Aug 18, 2026

   

   unbraind

   on Aug 18, 2026

   Owner

   More actions

   Canonical PM item: pm-aw59hb.
10. unbraind commented on Aug 22, 2026

    

    unbraind

    on Aug 22, 2026

    Owner

    More actions

    Shipped and closed in canonical PM item pm-aw59hb via PR #636 with exact coverage and hosted analyzer verification.
11. unbraind

    closed this as completedon Aug 22, 2026