[unbraind]

Summary

• track GitHub issue SDK: inject host-bound sdk into ImportExportContext #749 as a duplicate-safe SDK-first child with rich importer/exporter runtime lineage
• record the exact merged-main v2026.7.26 access-first recovery result and npm E403 authorization blocker
• leave both worked PM items open and unclaimed, with zero in-progress items

PM items

• pm-i7indd — SDK: inject host-bound runtime into ImportExportContext
• pm-7zs0 — Verify daily auto-release published to npm

Verification

• pnpm build
• pnpm changelog:pm:check with pm-changelog 2026.7.26, unchanged
• pm health --check-only --summary --json (ok: true, zero warnings)
• pm validate --check-resolution --check-history-drift --json (history drift zero; existing resolution metadata warning remains)
• pm list-in-progress --limit 50 (zero)
• git diff --check

External release state

The workflow is fail-closed and does not republish the immutable version. npm package visibility remains private because the release environment token receives E403 on the access mutation; issue #746 contains the maintainer credential action.

Summary by Sourcery

Record PM history and reminder updates for npm auto-release visibility and add tracking artifacts for the SDK importer runtime item.

Chores:

• Update pm-7zs0 history and reminder entries to reflect npm auto-release visibility and authorization outcome.
• Add pm-i7indd issue and history files to track the SDK importer/runtime lineage work without marking it in-progress.

---

Summary by cubic

Adds PM tracking for the importer/exporter SDK runtime lineage and records the v2026.7.26 npm visibility failure. Creates issue pm-i7indd (linked to GitHub #749) for injecting a host‑bound SDK into ImportExportContext, and updates the release reminder/history to note that npm access set status=public @unbraind/pm-cli returned E403; workflow remains fail‑closed and both items stay open/unclaimed.

^{Written for commit e250ce3. Summary will update on new commits.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Caution

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased.

[sourcery-ai]

🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[unbraind]

@coderabbitai full review

@greptileai please perform a full review of this exact tracker-governance head, including link correctness and PM history integrity.

[coderabbitai]

@unbraind I’ll perform a full review of this PR head, with particular attention to tracker governance, link correctness, and PM history integrity.

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

---

Your included review limit is currently reached under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. This review may still proceed through usage-based billing if eligible. Your next included review will be available in 59 minutes.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@unbraind, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 57 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 7032f460-435d-4b81-86eb-2f84e62e805f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3460861 and e250ce3.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .agents/pm/history/pm-7zs0.jsonl
• .agents/pm/history/pm-i7indd.jsonl
• .agents/pm/issues/pm-i7indd.toon
• .agents/pm/reminders/pm-7zs0.toon

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update release-health records with an npm visibility recovery failure and add issue-tracking records for injecting a host-bound SDK into ImportExportContext.

Changes

Release health evidence

Layer / File(s)	Summary
npm recovery evidence .agents/pm/history/pm-7zs0.jsonl, .agents/pm/reminders/pm-7zs0.toon	Records the E403 from npm access set status=public, confirms no immutable republish occurred, and returns the reminder to open.

SDK issue tracking

Layer / File(s)	Summary
ImportExportContext SDK issue .agents/pm/issues/pm-i7indd.toon, .agents/pm/history/pm-i7indd.jsonl	Adds the SDK injection issue specification and records its creation and Markdown body update.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• unbraind/pm-cli#375: Updates the same release-tracking artifacts with publish outcome evidence.
• unbraind/pm-cli#420: Updates the same release-health history file.
• unbraind/pm-cli#654: Updates the same release-tracking artifacts with release-health evidence.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the SDK lineage tracking and npm visibility blocker updates.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description matches the PR changes and objectives, covering the new issue tracking and npm recovery history updates.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 11 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing docs/import-export-sdk-lineage-release-blocker (e250ce3) with main (3460861)}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[unbraind]

Bot-feedback disposition for this exact head:

• Gemini sunset notice: down-voted because no review is available.
• Sourcery boilerplate guide: down-voted; its completed clean review is separately up-voted and requires no fix.
• CodeRabbit quota-only invocation reply: down-voted. Its detailed walkthrough is up-voted because it accurately identifies all four tracker files, the E403 fail-closed result, and the new SDK issue; it reports five pre-merge checks passed and no actionable finding.
• CodSpeed: up-voted; all 11 benchmarks are unchanged.
• Codecov: up-voted; all modified coverable lines and tests pass.

The thread-aware inventory contains zero inline threads, so there is no inline reply target to acknowledge. No bot raised an actionable change.

[unbraind]

Tracked in PM: pm-7zs0, pm-i7indd.