Repository navigation
[Bug]: PDF URI links are silently discarded by PDFContentScrapingStrategy due to Links schema mismatch #2374
Description
crawl4ai version
0.9.5 (also observed in 0.9.4).
Expected Behavior
URI link annotations extracted from a PDF should survive PDFContentScrapingStrategy.scrap() and be accessible in the returned ScrapingResult.links, with their source page numbers preserved or represented by an explicitly documented contract.
This report concerns preservation of the extracted link inventory, not reconstructing clickable text positions in HTML/Markdown or PDF-internal page destinations.
Current Behavior
The public processor extracts the URI correctly, but the public PDF scraping strategy returns success=True and empty internal / external link lists for the same file.
The apparent cause is a schema mismatch:
PDFContentScrapingStrategy.scrap()buildslinks = {"urls": []}and appends{"url": link, "page": page.page_number}.- It passes that dictionary to
ScrapingResult. ScrapingResult.linksis typed asLinks, which defines onlyinternalandexternal. ItsLinkitems usehrefrather thanurland have no explicit PDF page field.- The unrecognized
urlskey is silently ignored during model construction, losing the collected links.
Sources: PDF scraper, models, and PDF processor.
The PDF parsing documentation also describes links["urls"], suggesting that preserving PDF links is intended, but the current result model cannot represent that structure.
Is this reproducible?
Yes.
Inputs Causing the Bug
A local, generated one-page PDF containing one URI annotation. No browser, network requests, external files, credentials, or application-specific adapter is needed. The page is intentionally blank apart from its annotation to isolate link preservation.
Steps to Reproduce
- Use Python 3.12 and install
pip install "crawl4ai[pdf]==0.9.5". - Save the following snippet as
repro_pdf_links.py. - Run
python repro_pdf_links.py. - Observe that the processor contains the URI but the scraping result has empty link lists.
Code snippets
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
from pypdf import PdfWriter
from pypdf.annotations import Link
from crawl4ai.processors.pdf import PDFContentScrapingStrategy
from crawl4ai.processors.pdf.processor import NaivePDFProcessorStrategy
with TemporaryDirectory() as folder:
path = Path(folder) / "linked.pdf"
writer = PdfWriter()
writer.add_blank_page(width=612, height=792)
writer.add_annotation(
0,
Link(rect=(20, 20, 200, 40), url="https://example.org/reference"),
)
writer.write(path)
processed = NaivePDFProcessorStrategy(extract_images=False).process(path)
scraped = PDFContentScrapingStrategy(extract_images=False).scrap(str(path), "")
print("processor links:", processed.pages[0].links)
print("scraping success:", scraped.success)
print("scraping links:", scraped.links.model_dump())OS
macOS 27.0.1, Apple Silicon (arm64).
Python version
3.12.13; pypdf 6.20.1.
Browser
Not applicable; the reproduction uses a local PDF and public SDK methods directly.
Browser version
Not applicable.
Error logs & Screenshots (if applicable)
No exception is raised. Actual output on 0.9.5:
processor links: ['https://example.org/reference']
scraping success: True
scraping links: {'internal': [], 'external': []}
Proposed direction / contribution
I would like to contribute a focused fix targeting develop, with regression coverage using a generated PDF and updated documentation. Before changing the public link contract, could you confirm the intended representation?
One possible approach is to map PDF URI links into the existing internal / external structure using href, and add an optional 1-based page field to Link so PDF page attribution is not lost. For remote PDFs, classification could reuse the existing URL classification rules; for local PDFs without a source URL, treating URI links as external is a possible fallback, subject to maintainer preference.
This is a proposal rather than an assumed API decision. Reader reuse / parallel parsing optimization and reconstruction of inline clickable text would remain outside this fix.
Activity
ntohidi commentedon Oct 20, 2026
Thanks for the clear repro, it reproduces on develop. Your read is right:
PDFContentScrapingStrategy.scrap()collects the links as{"urls": [{"url", "page"}]}, butScrapingResult.linksis aLinksmodel with onlyinternalandexternal, so pydantic drops the unknownurlskey without an error. The processor finds the links; they just get lost when the result is built. The PDF parsing docs still describelinks["urls"], which made it look like it should work.#2375 maps the links into
internal/externalthe same way the HTML scraper does, and fixes the docs. We'll leave page numbers out for now and add an optionalpagefield toLinkif there's demand for it.fix(pdf): keep PDF URI links in ScrapingResult.links (#2374)
Merge pull request #2375 from Hugo-DDT/fix/2374-pdf-links