Bump codspeed to 5.0

[robert3005]

Let's get over the hump

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

#### 🎉 Hooray! `codspeed-rust` just leveled up to 5.0.0!

A heads-up, this is a breaking change and it might affect your current performance baseline a bit. But here's the exciting part - it's packed with new, cool features and promises improved result stability 🥳!
Curious about what's new? Visit our releases page to delve into all the awesome details about this new version.

⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1576 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(1000, 10)]	154.6 µs	190.9 µs	-19%
❌	Simulation	slice_empty_vortex	310 ns	368.3 ns	-15.84%
❌	Simulation	rebuild_naive	99.8 µs	111.2 µs	-10.27%
⚡	Simulation	chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)]	26.4 µs	16.1 µs	+63.93%
⚡	Simulation	true_count_arrow_buffer[128]	872.2 ns	726.4 ns	+20.08%
⚡	Simulation	chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(100, 100)]	260.4 µs	223.7 µs	+16.43%
⚡	Simulation	true_count_vortex_buffer[128]	638.3 ns	580 ns	+10.06%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing rk/bumpcodspeed (e89343a) with develop (e6d0e08)}