Remove LEGACY_SESSION from benchmarks and back compat tests#8554
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Robert Kruszewski <github@robertk.io>
|
@claude anything sus? |
|
Claude encountered an error after 3m 24s —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
AdamGS
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If benchmarks look good, lets ship it?
Merging this PR will not alter performance
|
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | sum_i32_nullable_all_valid |
36.5 µs | 171.3 µs | -78.71% |
| ❌ | Simulation | slice_empty_vortex |
310 ns | 368.3 ns | -15.84% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] |
26.8 µs | 16.1 µs | +66.73% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] |
273.6 ns | 215.3 ns | +27.1% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024] |
333.9 ns | 275.6 ns | +21.17% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[2048] |
427.8 ns | 369.4 ns | +15.79% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing rk/morenolegacy (a3aa8f3) with develop (71319b7)
Getting closer