You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[HOLD for payment 2024-11-22] [$250] Search - Not here page appears when selecting a non-existing user and then going online #51651
Version Number: 9.0.55-1 Reproducible in staging?: Y Reproducible in production?: Y If this was caught on HybridApp, is this reproducible on New Expensify Standalone?: N/A If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/5140184 Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):applausetester+bm176@applause.expensifail.com Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
@isabelastisser FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors
changed the title [-]Search - Not here page appears when selecting a non-existing user and then going online[/-][+][$250] Search - Not here page appears when selecting a non-existing user and then going online[/+]on Oct 30, 2024
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.62-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
@dukenv0307@isabelastisser@dukenv0307 The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion: N/A
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again. Yes
Regression Test Proposal Template
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 29, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to @isabelastisser (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.lanitochka17 commentedon Oct 29, 2024
@isabelastisser FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors
lanitochka17 commentedon Oct 29, 2024
We think that this bug might be related to #wave-control
NJ-2020 commentedon Oct 29, 2024
Same RCA as #51473
[-]Search - Not here page appears when selecting a non-existing user and then going online[/-][+][$250] Search - Not here page appears when selecting a non-existing user and then going online[/+]melvin-bot commentedon Oct 30, 2024
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021851703015510861438
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 30, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @mkhutornyi (
External)isabelastisser commentedon Oct 30, 2024
Heads up, I will be OOO from Oct 31 until Nov 4, so please re-apply the Bug label and assign a new member if needed. Thanks!
28 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Nov 15, 2024
Reviewinglabel has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".melvin-bot commentedon Nov 15, 2024
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.62-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-11-22. 🎊
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
melvin-bot commentedon Nov 15, 2024
@dukenv0307 @isabelastisser @dukenv0307 The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
isabelastisser commentedon Nov 22, 2024
Payment summary:
Payment made in Upwork to @NJ-2020 - contributor $250
@dukenv0307, payment pending in NewDot - $250 C+.
dukenv0307 commentedon Nov 25, 2024
BugZero Checklist:
Bug classification
Source of bug:
Where bug was reported:
Who reported the bug:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/51093/files#r1855741040
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion: N/A
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again. Yes
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Link to issue:
Regression Test Proposal
Test:
Do we agree 👍 or 👎
dukenv0307 commentedon Nov 25, 2024
Hey @isabelastisser I'll request payment via NewDot.
isabelastisser commentedon Nov 25, 2024
Payment summary.
isabelastisser commentedon Nov 25, 2024
All set!
JmillsExpensify commentedon Dec 5, 2024
$250 approved for @dukenv0307