Skip to content

[$1500] Show the full receipt when viewing an expense in the right hand pane in New Expensify #64025

Closed
9 of 9 issues completed

Description

@MitchExpensify

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: NA
Reproducible in staging?: NA
Reproducible in production?: NA
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): NA
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 NA
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL: https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/481617#issuecomment-2944736764
Issue reported by: mitch@expensify.com
Slack conversation (hyperlinked to channel name):

Action Performed:

  1. Open an individual expense in New Expensify

Expected Result (New Feature):

When viewing an individual expense in New Expensify the receipt image should be fully expanded like this (Figma):

Desktop

  1. The right hand pane will double in size and the receipt image section will show as much of the image as possible:

Image

Mileage example:

Image

No receipt example:

Image

eReceipt example:

Image

The expense details section which currently lives under the receipt image section will be shown alongside the receipt on the right side of the right hand pane

  1. When opening any expense detail row (e.g. Categories or Amount), the same right-hand pane behavior as today will occur. In this new design, the receipt image will use the same greyed-out background pattern that also exists today:

Image

Image

Workaround:

Can the user still use Expensify without this being fixed? Have you informed them of the workaround?

Platforms:

Select the officially supported platforms where the issue was reproduced:

  • Android: App
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: App
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • iOS: mWeb Chrome
  • Windows: Chrome
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
Platforms Tested: On which of our officially supported platforms was this issue tested:
  • Android: App
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: App
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • iOS: mWeb Chrome
  • Windows: Chrome
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

View all open jobs on GitHub

Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @joekaufmanexpensify

Activity

  1. melvin-bot commented on Jun 11, 2025

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @joekaufmanexpensify (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details. Please add this Feature request to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

  2. melvin-bot commented on Jun 11, 2025

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ It looks like this issue is labelled as a New Feature but not tied to any GitHub Project. Keep in mind that all new features should be tied to GitHub Projects in order to properly track external CAP software time ⚠️

  3. melvin-bot commented on Jun 11, 2025

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to Design team member for new feature review - @dubielzyk-expensify (NewFeature)

  4. dubielzyk-expensify commented on Jun 12, 2025

    @dubielzyk-expensify
    Contributor

    Assigning this to @shawnborton as he did the mocks 👍 Feel free to rope the rest of design for extra review eyes 👀😄

  5. shawnborton commented on Jun 12, 2025

    @shawnborton
    Contributor

    Thanks! Holler if we need any help. @MitchExpensify and then do you have a separate issue for the receipt hovering feature we discussed too?

  6. MitchExpensify commented on Jun 13, 2025

    @MitchExpensify
    ContributorAuthor

    @MitchExpensify and then do you have a separate issue for the receipt hovering feature we discussed too?

  7. 191 remaining items

  8. mountiny commented on Nov 21, 2025

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    #72007
    #71975
    #72014
    #71977
    #71996
    #71983
    #72078

    Were technically a regressions that should have been caught in the original PR and the first 4 been split up for easier roll out and review.

    I would suggest going with $1500 that would also include #72314.

    I agree this was a larger task and the time required was more than other $500 tasks

  9. parasharrajat commented on Nov 22, 2025

    @parasharrajat
    Member

    Thanks for considering the compensation change. I agree there should be no regressions and should have been caught and solved, but these changes were touching quite many scenarios, so a few were expected.

    I would request the price to change to $1500 to better fit all recurring reviews and the urgency of these bugs.

  10. mountiny commented on Nov 23, 2025

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    I am fine with that given you had worked with urgency on these tasks and helped us deliver it in a short timeframe, thanks, updated

  11. changed the title [-][$500] Show the full receipt when viewing an expense in the right hand pane in New Expensify[/-] [+][$1500] Show the full receipt when viewing an expense in the right hand pane in New Expensify[/+] on Nov 23, 2025
  12. melvin-bot commented on Nov 23, 2025

    @melvin-bot

    ⚠️ Could not update price automatically because there is no linked Upwork Job ID. The BZ team member will need to update the price manually in Upwork.

  13. joekaufmanexpensify commented on Nov 24, 2025

    @joekaufmanexpensify
    Contributor

    All set to issue payment here!

  14. joekaufmanexpensify commented on Nov 24, 2025

    @joekaufmanexpensify
    Contributor

    Payment Summary

  15. joekaufmanexpensify commented on Nov 24, 2025

    @joekaufmanexpensify
    Contributor

    @parasharrajat please request payment at your earliest convenience. Closing as this is otherwise all set!

  16. parasharrajat commented on Dec 19, 2025

    @parasharrajat
    Member

    Payment requested as per #64025 (comment)

  17. twisterdotcom commented on Dec 19, 2025

    @twisterdotcom
    Contributor

    @parasharrajat has submitted payment for this report on ND here.

    SO: https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/7582

    Zapier Logs Run ID: 00040eee-bf0d-a094-b80d-cc7fa503ed04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionNewFeatureSomething to build that is a new item.ReviewingHas a PR in reviewWeeklyKSv2

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions