Repository navigation
[Due for payment 2026-09-17] Extend right-click "Mark all as read" to all Inbox tabs #99809
Description
Problem
PR #98950 added a right-click (long-press on mobile) "Mark all as read" option, but only on the Unread tab. People sitting on Focus or To-do have to switch tabs to reach it.
Proposal
Show the same "Mark all as read" context-menu option on every Inbox tab — Focus, Unread, To-do, and the Recent tab when it ships (Expensify/Expensify#669633).
Behavior stays identical to the Unread tab: the option calls the existing markAllMessagesAsRead() and is hidden when there are no unreads (see #99379).
Reported in Slack.
Activity
hungvu193 commentedon Aug 29, 2026
@truph01 will work on this as this a follow-up from our previous work
hungvu193 commentedon Sep 1, 2026
#99830 is ready for review
melvin-bot commentedon Sep 8, 2026
Triggered auto assignment to @danieldoglas, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.
[-]Extend right-click "Mark all as read" to all Inbox tabs[/-][+][Due for payment 2026-09-17] Extend right-click "Mark all as read" to all Inbox tabs[/+]1 remaining item
melvin-bot commentedon Sep 10, 2026
@truph01
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.4.75-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2026-09-17. 🎊
The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the Contributor+ Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]. If no checklist is needed for this issue, you can click: [no checklist button]
melvin-bot commentedon Sep 14, 2026
@truph01 Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!
melvin-bot commentedon Sep 16, 2026
Triggered auto assignment to @mallenexpensify (
Awaiting Payment)melvin-bot commentedon Sep 16, 2026
Payment Summary
Resolving PRs:
Implement Mark all as read for all Inbox tab #99830
Contributor: @hungvu193 does not require payment (Contractor)
Reviewer: @truph01 owed $250 via NewDot
BugZero Checklist (@mallenexpensify)
melvin-bot commentedon Sep 21, 2026
@mallenexpensify Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this?
mallenexpensify commentedon Sep 22, 2026
Payment Summary
Contributor+: @truph01 due $250 via NewDot
@truph01 plz complete the Contributor+ checklist and tag me in a post once you have. Thx
truph01 commentedon Sep 22, 2026
Contributor+ Checklist:
[Contributor] The offending PR and associated issue have been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to the comment on the PR:
Link to the comment on the Issue:
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion:
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
Regression Test Proposal
Precondition:
Test:
Do we agree 👍 or 👎