clang-tidy: resolve modernize-concat-nested-namespaces

[knoepfel]

Resolve modernize-concat-nested-namespaces clang-tidy warnings.

• Code quality

  • Replaced nested namespace syntax in form/form/technology.hpp with namespace form::technology.
  • Preserved all technology constants, helper functions, values, and behavior.
  • Resolved modernize-concat-nested-namespaces clang-tidy warnings.

• Documentation

  • Marked modernize-concat-nested-namespaces as complete.
  • Added the associated PR #804 reference to docs/dev/clang-tidy-fixes-2026-04.md.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 16dd9f19-6be7-4f93-bb6a-3646f0163d9b

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR replaces nested namespace syntax in form/form/technology.hpp with namespace form::technology. It also marks the related clang-tidy checklist item complete and adds the PR reference.

Changes

Namespace modernization

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Modernize namespace syntax and tracking form/form/technology.hpp, docs/dev/clang-tidy-fixes-2026-04.md	The technology declarations use C++ nested namespace syntax without changing values or behavior. The checklist records the completed modernize-concat-nested-namespaces fix and PR reference.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Framework-R-D/phlex#756: Applies related clang-tidy declaration and style fixes.
• Framework-R-D/phlex#772: Updates the same clang-tidy tracking document for another check.

Suggested reviewers: beojan

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the clang-tidy warning resolved by the code and documentation changes.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
form/form/technology.hpp	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #804      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.89%   84.03%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         171      171              
  Lines        7234     7234              
  Branches      850      850              
==========================================
+ Hits         6069     6079      +10     
+ Misses        881      874       -7     
+ Partials      284      281       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
scripts	80.09% <ø> (ø)
unittests	86.00% <66.66%> (+0.20%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
form/form/technology.hpp	66.66% <66.66%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 240a461...1f75054. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[pcanal]

LGTM

[pcanal]

Something went odd on this PR. I only see the documentation part left as part of this PR but the commit log mentions this same PR ( #804 ) where it probably meant to refer to #816

[knoepfel]

Something went odd on this PR. I only see the documentation part left as part of this PR but the commit log mentions this same PR ( #804 ) where it probably meant to refer to #816

Sorry to be confusing, @pcanal. When the PR was originally created, it included the fixes that concatenate nested namespaces in FORM. Then PR #816 was merged, which addressed the problem. The log on this PR was not updated, though. The commit history, however, should be clear.

[pcanal]

Nothing (more) we can do about it but the commit log of 03891a9 is mentioning #804. However this conversation will disambiguate the issue for future readers :)

[knoepfel]

Nothing (more) we can do about it but the commit log of 03891a9 is mentioning #804. However this conversation will disambiguate the issue for future readers :)

Argh...you're right. I thought the commit message was fixed. Oops. Sigh.