Repository navigation
Move Docker Provider to the New Structure - #46097
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
Conflicts to resolve :( |
bugraoz93
force-pushed
the
feat/46045/move-docker
branch
from
January 27, 2025 23:41
d1e8fdc to
bba6852
Compare
Contributor
Author
Fixed it. Thanks for the review! :) |
potiuk
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2025
bugraoz93
force-pushed
the
feat/46045/move-docker
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 29, 2025 23:06
43d5664 to
3ed8b60
Compare
potiuk
force-pushed
the
feat/46045/move-docker
branch
from
January 30, 2025 03:49
3ed8b60 to
ba613fc
Compare
potiuk
force-pushed
the
feat/46045/move-docker
branch
from
January 30, 2025 07:28
ba613fc to
a31cab8
Compare
potiuk
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2025
got686-yandex
pushed a commit
to got686-yandex/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2025
* Move Docker Provider to the New Structure * Fix test related to checking provider examples * Fix taskflow.rst docker example path
dabla
pushed a commit
to dabla/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2025
* Move Docker Provider to the New Structure * Fix test related to checking provider examples * Fix taskflow.rst docker example path
ambika-garg
pushed a commit
to ambika-garg/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2025
* Move Docker Provider to the New Structure * Fix test related to checking provider examples * Fix taskflow.rst docker example path
niklasr22
pushed a commit
to niklasr22/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2025
* Move Docker Provider to the New Structure * Fix test related to checking provider examples * Fix taskflow.rst docker example path
ambika-garg
pushed a commit
to ambika-garg/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
* Move Docker Provider to the New Structure * Fix test related to checking provider examples * Fix taskflow.rst docker example path
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
related: #46045
Provider Related PR: #45745
There is a PR for this provider. I believe rebasing should fix the problems if this creates conflicts.
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.