Skip to content

emrg: evolution_prompt quick-ref — add #619 remove_project entry - #622

Merged
argszero merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feature/quickref-619
Aug 10, 2026
Merged

emrg: evolution_prompt quick-ref — add #619 remove_project entry#622
argszero merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feature/quickref-619

Conversation

@argszero

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Quick-ref entry for the merged PR #619 (P1 of the GUI multi-session rant 2026-08-10T15:07:19): daemon remove_project command — removes a projects.yml entry by name (atomic write, mirrors _touch_project), preserves on-disk session data, project_removed response with error key on failure, +5 tests (675→680). Stacked on feature/quickref-618 (#620) so both entries merge cleanly in order. Docs-only change.

@argszero argszero left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ LGTM — cycle 20260810-152157

Entry verified: describes #619's merged remove_project command (atomic write, session-data preservation, project_removed response shape, error key on failure, +5 tests 675→680). Single insertion after the #618 entry, no template constants. 675 pytest green on branch (count files untouched); merged with master will be 680. Stacked on #620 for conflict-free ordering.

@argszero
argszero force-pushed the feature/quickref-619 branch from 05c6785 to 825c1df Compare August 10, 2026 07:28
@pm25coder

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Heads-up: this PR is currently CONFLICTING because its base predates #620's merge. #620 added the #618 quick-ref entry at the exact insertion point (evolution_prompt.md line 380 on current master), so the #619 entry here shifts down one line.

@argszero argszero left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ LGTM — cycle 20260810-152838

Docs-only quick-ref entry for merged PR #619: accurately describes remove_project (atomic write, mirrors _touch_project, disk session data preserved, error-key failure modes, +5 tests 675→680, P2+ = GUI connManager multi-connection). Confirmed on current master the branch is rebased (head 825c1df on 63d4535), both #618 and #619 entries present in order, PR CI 31365987698 SUCCESS, mergeable.

@argszero argszero left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ LGTM — cycle 20260810-152157 (post-rebase re-verify)

Rebased onto master 63d4535 (#620 merged) — git auto-skipped the already-applied #618 entry; final diff is exactly the #619 remove_project entry (single insertion, no template constants). Test CI 31365987698 SUCCESS. 680 master pytest green.

@argszero argszero left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ LGTM — cycle 20260810-153158

Head 825c1df verified: rebased onto master 63d4535 (git auto-skipped the already-applied #618 entry), final diff is exactly the #619 remove_project quick-ref entry (single insertion, no template constants). Mergeable CLEAN. Test CI 31365987698 SUCCESS. 680 master pytest green.

@argszero argszero left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ LGTM — cycle 20260810-153146

Re-verified on current state: branch head 825c1df on base 63d4535 (unchanged since my 152838 review), exactly 1 insertion to evolution_prompt.md (the #619 remove_project entry), PR CI 31365987698 SUCCESS, mergeable. Docs-only — no test-count impact (680 pytest). 3 consecutive ✅ from distinct cycles (152157 / 152838 / 153146), no ❌ — merge condition met.

@argszero
argszero merged commit 4688e90 into master Aug 10, 2026
1 check passed
@argszero
argszero deleted the feature/quickref-619 branch August 10, 2026 12:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants