Skip to content

adding generalized sequence smoothing helpers - #267

Merged
keighrim merged 6 commits into
developfrom
265-stitcher
Mar 20, 2024
Merged

keighrim merged 6 commits into
developfrom
265-stitcher

Conversation

@keighrim

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

fixes #265 .

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 19, 2024 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 68.64407% with 37 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.48%. Comparing base (19f7155) to head (5ce1618).

Files Patch % Lines
mmif/utils/sequence_helper.py 66.96% 37 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #267      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    91.74%   89.48%   -2.27%     
===========================================
  Files            9       10       +1     
  Lines         1115     1227     +112     
===========================================
+ Hits          1023     1098      +75     
- Misses          92      129      +37     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 89.48% <68.64%> (-2.27%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

…on numpy, fixed type hints, more test coverage
@keighrim
keighrim merged commit d9c63a3 into develop Mar 20, 2024
@keighrim
keighrim deleted the 265-stitcher branch March 20, 2024 20:59
@keighrim keighrim mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

generalized (very short) time annotation stitcher

1 participant