Skip to content

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-05-22 #42496

Closed

Description

@github-actions

Release Version: 1.4.75-1
Compare Changes: production...staging

This release contains changes from the following pull requests:

Deploy Blockers:

Deployer verifications:

  • I checked the App Timing Dashboard and verified this release does not cause a noticeable performance regression.
  • I checked Firebase Crashlytics and verified that this release does not introduce any new crashes. More detailed instructions on this verification can be found here.
  • I checked GitHub Status and verified there is no reported incident with Actions.

cc @Expensify/applauseleads

Activity

  1. OSBotify commented on May 23, 2024

    @OSBotify
    Contributor

    🚀 All staging deploys are complete, @Expensify/applauseleads please begin QA on version https://github.com/Expensify/App/releases/tag/1.4.75-0 🚀

  2. kbecciv commented on May 23, 2024

    @kbecciv

    Prod QA #42286 and #42288 - checking off

  3. Julesssss commented on May 23, 2024

    @Julesssss
    Contributor

    Demoting #42519

  4. blimpich commented on May 23, 2024

    @blimpich
    Contributor

    Demoting #42540

  5. kbecciv commented on May 23, 2024

    @kbecciv

    TR is 16% left

    #40354 is pending validation
    #41050 is pending validation, left comment #41050 (comment)
    #41622 is failing with #42540
    #41627 is failing with #42534
    #41706 is failing with #41883, repro in prod - is it ok checking off?
    #42020 is failing with #42020 on Web, Android and IOS app
    #42420 the same PR as #40354, checking off

    Deploy Blockers:
    #42523
    #42557

  6. kbecciv commented on May 23, 2024

    @kbecciv

    @mountiny @Julesssss Is this PR #41050 for automated tests?

  7. mountiny commented on May 23, 2024

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    @kbecciv yeah should be NoQA

  8. mountiny commented on May 23, 2024

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    Demoted #42557

  9. chiragsalian commented on May 24, 2024

    @chiragsalian
    Contributor

    #41706 is failing with #41883, repro in prod - is it ok checking off?

    Yeah that's fine, checking it off.

    #42020 is failing with #42020 on Web, Android and IOS app

    I think you meant failing on #42522. If so do you mean always or only for the specific case mentioned in #42522?

  10. mvtglobally commented on May 24, 2024

    @mvtglobally

    TR is at 4%. We will post the final summary in the morning EST

  11. kbecciv commented on May 24, 2024

    @kbecciv

    Regression is completed!

    #40354 is failing with #42563
    #41622 is failing with #42540
    #41627 is failing with #42534
    #42020 is failing with #42522

    Deploy Blocker:
    #42523

  12. kbecciv commented on May 24, 2024

    @kbecciv

    #42020 is failing with #42020 on Web, Android and IOS app

    Correct, I meant #42522. The issue is consistently reproducible, and behavior is expected #42522 (comment)

  13. chiragsalian commented on May 24, 2024

    @chiragsalian
    Contributor

    Checking off #40354 - reasoning
    Checking off #41622 - reasoning
    Checking off #41627 - reasoning

  14. chiragsalian commented on May 24, 2024

    @chiragsalian
    Contributor

    Checking off #42020 - reasoning

  15. amyevans commented on May 25, 2024

    @amyevans
    Contributor

    Checked off #42523 after Applause verified in staging

  16. isagoico commented on May 27, 2024

    @isagoico

    #42599 Checking it off. Retest executed here

  17. puneetlath commented on May 27, 2024

    @puneetlath
    Contributor

    :shipit:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions