[kachawla]

Description

Adding on-call team as owner for dependency-related files to allow them to approve and merge version updates (Dependabot PRs).

Contributor checklist

Please verify that the PR meets the following requirements, where applicable:

• An overview of proposed schema changes is included in a linked GitHub issue.
  • Yes
  • Not applicable
• A design document PR is created in the design-notes repository, if new APIs are being introduced.
  • Yes
  • Not applicable
• The design document has been reviewed and approved by Radius maintainers/approvers.
  • Yes
  • Not applicable
• A PR for the samples repository is created, if existing samples are affected by the changes in this PR.
  • Yes
  • Not applicable
• A PR for the documentation repository is created, if the changes in this PR affect the documentation or any user facing updates are made.
  • Yes
  • Not applicable
• A PR for the recipes repository is created, if existing recipes are affected by the changes in this PR.
  • Yes
  • Not applicable

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 59.89%. Comparing base (a513ad5) to head (afd7b7a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8884      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.89%   59.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         595      595              
  Lines       40481    40481              
==========================================
- Hits        24248    24245       -3     
- Misses      14406    14408       +2     
- Partials     1827     1828       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[radius-functional-tests]

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name	Value
Repository	kachawla/radius
Commit ref	f1765ec
Unique ID	func5beec9d747
Image tag	pr-func5beec9d747

Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run

• gotestsum 1.12.0
• KinD: v0.20.0
• Dapr:
• Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
• Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
• Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func5beec9d747
• Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
• applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func5beec9d747
• dynamic-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/dynamic-rp:pr-func5beec9d747
• controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func5beec9d747
• ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func5beec9d747
• deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded

[radius-functional-tests]

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name	Value
Repository	kachawla/radius
Commit ref	909457b
Unique ID	func6961decba6
Image tag	pr-func6961decba6

Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run

• gotestsum 1.12.0
• KinD: v0.20.0
• Dapr:
• Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
• Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
• Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func6961decba6
• Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
• applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func6961decba6
• dynamic-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/dynamic-rp:pr-func6961decba6
• controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func6961decba6
• ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func6961decba6
• deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded

[brooke-hamilton]

While in the on-call role I'm unable to approve this Snyk PR which edits a Dockerfile, so maybe we need to add Dockerfiles as well. What do you think?

[radius-functional-tests]

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name	Value
Repository	kachawla/radius
Commit ref	1b8bc48
Unique ID	func0aa3603fa8
Image tag	pr-func0aa3603fa8

Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run

• gotestsum 1.12.0
• KinD: v0.20.0
• Dapr:
• Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
• Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
• Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func0aa3603fa8
• Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
• applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func0aa3603fa8
• dynamic-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/dynamic-rp:pr-func0aa3603fa8
• controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func0aa3603fa8
• ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func0aa3603fa8
• deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded

[radius-functional-tests]

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name	Value
Repository	kachawla/radius
Commit ref	afd7b7a
Unique ID	func30c81788ec
Image tag	pr-func30c81788ec

Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run

• gotestsum 1.12.0
• KinD: v0.20.0
• Dapr:
• Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
• Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
• Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func30c81788ec
• Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
• applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func30c81788ec
• dynamic-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/dynamic-rp:pr-func30c81788ec
• controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func30c81788ec
• ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func30c81788ec
• deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded

[kachawla]

While in the on-call role I'm unable to approve this Snyk PR which edits a Dockerfile, so maybe we need to add Dockerfiles as well. What do you think?

@brooke-hamilton addressed in #8933