Skip to content

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-08-15 #47512

Closed

Description

@github-actions

Release Version: 9.0.21-4
Compare Changes: production...staging

This release contains changes from the following pull requests:

Deploy Blockers:

Deployer verifications:

  • I checked the App Timing Dashboard and verified this release does not cause a noticeable performance regression.
  • I checked Firebase Crashlytics and verified that this release does not introduce any new crashes. More detailed instructions on this verification can be found here.
  • I checked GitHub Status and verified there is no reported incident with Actions.

cc @Expensify/applauseleads

Activity

  1. OSBotify commented on Aug 15, 2024

    @OSBotify
    Contributor

    🚀 All staging deploys are complete, @Expensify/applauseleads please begin QA on version https://github.com/Expensify/App/releases/tag/9.0.21-0 🚀

  2. grgia commented on Aug 16, 2024

    @grgia
    Contributor

    demoted #47551 as it's internal

  3. mvtglobally commented on Aug 16, 2024

    @mvtglobally

    Regression
    Crit/High TCs - 95% completed
    Med/Low TCs - 0% completed

    PRs:
    #46324 - Failing with #45408
    #46635 is failing with #47557
    #46939 is failing with KI #46816. repro in PROD, checking off
    #47028 - Failing with #46336
    #47091 - Pass-bug only on iOS with #47550. checking off
    #47092 - Pending validation on all platforms
    #47144 - Pass-bug on Android/iOS only with known issue #46228 checking off
    #47243 - Pending validation on IOS
    #47288 is failing #47572
    #47340 - Pending validation on all platforms
    #47368 & #47397 seem to be conflicting. Which one should we QA?
    #47450 - Failing with original KI #44829 on Web/mWeb/Desktop. Pending validation on IOs and Android
    #47527 - Pending validation on all platforms

    Blockers
    #47524
    #47525
    #47538
    #47553
    #47557

  4. Beamanator commented on Aug 16, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    #47538 was demoted

  5. Beamanator commented on Aug 16, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    #47557 was closed as NAB 👍

  6. Beamanator commented on Aug 16, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    #47368 & #47397 seem to be conflicting. Which one should we QA?

    I commented in #47397 that we should QA #47397, NOT #47368 👍 so I'll check #47368 off the list

  7. mvtglobally commented on Aug 17, 2024

    @mvtglobally

    Regression
    Crit/High TCs - 100% completed
    Med/Low TCs - 70% completed

  8. Beamanator commented on Aug 17, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    #47525 marked NAB (probably b/c it was fixed in #47527 which was CP'd

  9. Beamanator commented on Aug 17, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    Checking off #46635 b/c its blocker was marked NAB

  10. Beamanator commented on Aug 17, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    Similarly, checking off #46324 b/c its blocker (#47538) was marked nAB

  11. Beamanator commented on Aug 17, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    Checking off #47288 b/c the bug it's failing with (#47572) is reproducible in prod

  12. mvtglobally commented on Aug 17, 2024

    @mvtglobally

    Regression
    Crit/High TCs - 100% completed
    Med/Low TCs - 95% completed

  13. mvtglobally commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @mvtglobally

    Regression is completed

    PRs:
    #47028 - Failing with #46336
    #47092 - Can you pls QA internally?
    #47340 - Pending validation on Web
    #47555 - Pending validation on all platforms

    Blockers
    #47524
    #47553
    #47601

  14. Beamanator commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    #47553 fixed by #47555

    • Only checking off the deploy blocker b/c the PR is also supposed to fix a 2nd blocker
  15. Beamanator commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    #47524 was also fixed by #47555 - checking both off!

  16. Beamanator commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    #47028 doesn't look like it caused a new bug, it just didn't completely solve the bug it was trying to fix - so we can check it off

    • I commented in the issue, asking if there was any bigger issue found, but it doesn't look like it
  17. Beamanator commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    Just saw that #47092 can be checked off!

  18. Beamanator commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    Checking off #47450 as well b/c it doesn't cause new bugs, it just didn't quite fix the original bug & notification preference structure (in Onyx) is currently being updated anyway

  19. Beamanator commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    QA verified in slack here that #47397 passed on all platforms! checking it off!

  20. Beamanator commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    #47340 confirmed working in web & all other platforms here

  21. Beamanator commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    #47562 was demoted, checking it off

  22. luacmartins commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    Checking #47601 off. Fixed in staging!

  23. Beamanator commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    Looking good! shipping!

  24. Beamanator commented on Aug 19, 2024

    @Beamanator
    Contributor

    :shipit:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions