Skip to content

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2023-11-27 #32066

Closed

Description

@github-actions

Release Version: 1.4.4-3
Compare Changes: production...staging

This release contains changes from the following pull requests:

Deploy Blockers:

Deployer verifications:

  • I checked the App Timing Dashboard and verified this release does not cause a noticeable performance regression.
  • I checked Firebase Crashlytics and verified that this release does not introduce any new crashes. More detailed instructions on this verification can be found here.
  • I checked GitHub Status and verified there is no reported incident with Actions.

cc @Expensify/applauseleads

Activity

  1. melvin-bot commented on Nov 27, 2023

    @melvin-bot
  2. os-botify commented on Nov 27, 2023

    @os-botify
  3. melvin-bot commented on Nov 27, 2023

    @melvin-bot
  4. OSBotify commented on Nov 27, 2023

    @OSBotify
    Contributor

    🚀 All staging deploys are complete, @Expensify/applauseleads please begin QA on version https://github.com/Expensify/App/releases/tag/1.4.4-0 🚀

  5. kavimuru commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @kavimuru

    Regression is 2% left.
    #31050 failing with #32082
    #31102 failing with #32076
    #31401 failing with #32104 and #32085
    #31133 failing with #32126
    #31291 failing with #32078 and #32122
    #31629 failing with #32079
    #31353 not sure if we have to test the internal steps provided, #31353 (comment)

  6. mountiny commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    Demoted #32118

  7. mountiny commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    Demoted #32080 repro in production

  8. Julesssss commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @Julesssss
    Contributor

    Demoting #32119. It isn't reproducable in prod so its impossible to confirm.

    It's still a high-priority issue.

  9. Julesssss commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @Julesssss
    Contributor

    The comment wasn't added, but I cherry-picked the fix to issue #31830

  10. luacmartins commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    Checking off #32083 and #32104. We CPed a revert and tested well in staging.

  11. luacmartins commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    Checking off #32077. We CPed a fix and it tests well in staging.

  12. marcaaron commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @marcaaron
    Contributor

    Checking off #32082 - seems like tester error

  13. mvtglobally commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @mvtglobally

    Regression is completed.

    No Open blockers

    #31050 failing with #32082
    #31102 failing with #32076. Repro in PROD, checking off
    #31133 failing with #32126
    #31291 failing with #32078(repro in prod) and #32122(closed as not an issue) checking off.
    #31353 can you QA internally?
    #31401 failing with #32104 and #32085. Both are closed now. Do we need to retest or can check it off?
    #31629 failing with #32079. Repro in prod, checking off.
    #31851 just pending IOS validation
    #32097 (comment) - Can you QA internally?

  14. AndrewGable commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @AndrewGable
    Contributor

    @luacmartins tested #32097, checking it off.

  15. mountiny commented on Nov 29, 2023

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    Checking #31353 off, QA almost finished, but not a blocker

  16. mountiny commented on Nov 29, 2023

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    :shipit:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions