Skip to content

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-02-19 #36820

Closed

Description

@github-actions

Release Version: 1.4.43-20
Compare Changes: production...staging

This release contains changes from the following pull requests:

Deploy Blockers:

Deployer verifications:

  • I checked the App Timing Dashboard and verified this release does not cause a noticeable performance regression.
  • I checked Firebase Crashlytics and verified that this release does not introduce any new crashes. More detailed instructions on this verification can be found here.
  • I checked GitHub Status and verified there is no reported incident with Actions.

cc @Expensify/applauseleads

Activity

  1. OSBotify commented on Feb 19, 2024

    @OSBotify
    Contributor

    🚀 All staging deploys are complete, @Expensify/applauseleads please begin QA on version https://github.com/Expensify/App/releases/tag/1.4.43-0 🚀

  2. Julesssss commented on Feb 20, 2024

    @Julesssss
    Contributor

    Checking off #36853 as it's no longer occuring

  3. cristipaval commented on Feb 20, 2024

    @cristipaval
    Contributor

    Checking off #36854 as the fix is already CP'd into staging

  4. Julesssss commented on Feb 20, 2024

    @Julesssss
    Contributor

    Checking off #36902 as it's an edge case

  5. tgolen commented on Feb 20, 2024

    @tgolen
    Contributor

    Checking off #36912 as NAB

  6. kavimuru commented on Feb 20, 2024

    @kavimuru

    Regression is 1% left.
    #36637 is failing in mweb with #36926 and repro in PROD. Checking it off.
    #36154 failing with #36870 in iOS
    #36147 failing with #36854
    #35922 failing with #36860
    #35885 failing with #36869
    #32329 failing with #36864 repro in PROD, checking it off

    We are still working on the PRs.

  7. francoisl commented on Feb 20, 2024

    @francoisl
    Contributor

    Demoting 36903, checking it off
    Demoting 36861, needs backend changes and NAB

  8. Julesssss commented on Feb 21, 2024

    @Julesssss
    Contributor

    Checking off #36959 as its occurring on prod

  9. kavimuru commented on Feb 21, 2024

    @kavimuru

    Regression is completed. We are waiting for the build version to validate CPs
    unchecked PRs:
    #36154 failing with #36870 in iOS
    #36147 failing with #36854
    #35922 failing with #36860
    #35885 failing with #36869
    #36426 failing with #36913 repro in PROD, checking it off
    #36538 failing with #36928
    #33969 failing with #37013 repro in PROD checking it off
    #35886 looks like internal testing.

    Open Blockers:
    #36834
    #36835
    #36857
    #36859
    #36860
    #36865
    #36868
    #36870
    #36885
    #36888
    #36889
    #36905
    #36906
    #36911
    #36916
    #36917
    #36924
    #36951
    #36952
    #36955
    #36991
    #37012
    #37014
    #37015
    #37020
    #37017

  10. rlinoz commented on Feb 21, 2024

    @rlinoz
    Contributor

    Demoting #37012

  11. chiragsalian commented on Feb 21, 2024

    @chiragsalian
    Contributor

    @kavimuru

    I'll post on slack shortly to move blockers that are waiting on us to address.

  12. shubham1206agra commented on Feb 22, 2024

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor
  13. 3 remaining items

  14. rlinoz commented on Feb 22, 2024

    @rlinoz
    Contributor

    PR #36914 was CP'd and fixed #36865, tested and checking both off.

  15. chiragsalian commented on Feb 22, 2024

    @chiragsalian
    Contributor

    Checking off #35922 as per comment
    Checking off #36932 and #36936 because their linked PRs are checked off.
    #36914 is on staging and ready for qa team to test
    #36860 - we believe this has been addressed by #36919. Can you retest?
    #36868 - has a PR on staging and ready for qa team to test.
    #36892 - can qa team retest or check it off the list. It looks like its linked PR was CP'd and tested on staging.
    Checking off #36924 since its mentioned as fixed in previous comment
    Checking off #36951 since issue is no longer reproducible

  16. kavimuru commented on Feb 22, 2024

    @kavimuru

    @chiragsalian
    #36914 is a pass checked off
    #36860 , #36868 and #36892 are all fixed.

  17. luacmartins commented on Feb 23, 2024

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    Checking off #37109. It was a known issues during dev on a WIP feature. We have a PR up to fix it.

  18. chiragsalian commented on Feb 23, 2024

    @chiragsalian
    Contributor

    Checking off #35885, - reasoning
    Checking off #36857 - reasoning
    I've checked off #36860 , #36868 and #36892 since its mentioned as fixed in previous comment.
    Checking off #36885 as per comment.
    Checking off #36905 because its linked PR was CP-d and checked off.
    Checking off #36991 because its linked PR was CP-d and checked off.

  19. chiragsalian commented on Feb 23, 2024

    @chiragsalian
    Contributor

    CP-d #36978, can qa team test and if it passes verify if #36916 can be checked off.
    Cp-d #37066, can qa team test and if it passes verify if #36899 can be checked off.

  20. francoisl commented on Feb 23, 2024

    @francoisl
    Contributor

    37066/36899 tested on staging, checking both off

  21. kavimuru commented on Feb 25, 2024

    @kavimuru

    Unchecked PRs:
    cp #37036 is still failing with #36906. See comment.
    #36154 failing with #36870 in iOS

    Open blockers:
    #36870
    #36906
    #36916
    #36952
    #37092
    #37168

  22. puneetlath commented on Feb 26, 2024

    @puneetlath
    Contributor

    Checking off #37036 as they'll continue to work on it in #36906 which is no longer a deploy blocker.

  23. puneetlath commented on Feb 26, 2024

    @puneetlath
    Contributor

    Checking off #36916 as it was fixed by #36978

  24. puneetlath commented on Feb 26, 2024

    @puneetlath
    Contributor

    Checking off #37168 as it's more of a feature/polish request than a bug/blocker.

  25. puneetlath commented on Feb 26, 2024

    @puneetlath
    Contributor

    Checking off #36952 as not a blocker as discussed here.

  26. puneetlath commented on Feb 26, 2024

    @puneetlath
    Contributor

    :shipit:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions